From: Jonathan Spencer, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
foot self in shoots?
Why should someone who had 24 hr police protection need a gun for self
defence?
which implies that the police *can* provide protection to Salman
JFK.
and a bunch of others prove that protectors failed to protect
In my
From: "Michael Burke", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Snip.
I will never ever be convinced by anyone that a general right to carry
firearms for self defence should ever be allowed in this country.
IG
--
IG,
If you knew the law, you would know that we already have this right, its
part of our written
From: Don Baldwin, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why should someone who had 24 hr police protection need a gun for self
defence?
On the off chance that the VIP does have a chance to take
action in self defense.
Yes, very true. So are we thinking more in terms of, say, a house burglar?
Look at the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Norwegian Prime Minister.
Heh, got ya IG it was the Swedish PM. He was shot in
Stockholm when returning with his wife from the Cinema
one evening, a bloke walked out from a side Street and
killed him with a .357, he didn't have any body guards
with him at the
From: "niel fagan", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: "IG", INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
OK, I'll take up that challenge, as you might expect
Why should someone who had 24 hr police protection need a gun
for self defence
IG
Following your argument then, we the tax payers, are having
vast sums of OUR
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
suggest you join the NRA of America, IG, and read the Armed
Citizen column.
Try, "more Guns less crime" by John Lott. I've got a copy
you can borrow if you want.
Jonathan Laws
--
The problem with that book is that you need a degree in
statistical analysis to
From: "IG", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You're talking about bodyguards being ineffective, which if anything
only bolsters the argument for the intended victim to be armed. If
the Queen had had a pistol in a holster, she could have shot back.
Not if she was lying on the pavement leaking blood all
From: "pa49", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When all is said and done we all have the requirement for a level of self
defense. But, it appears that we are all, nowadays, automatically expected
to relinquish the duty to provide it to an external authority. And then when
that authority fails to deliver we
From: "IG", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Salmon Rushdie said
on US TV that he had asked for a gun and the police had
refused. Who can coherently argue that people like that
shouldn't have a gun for self-defence?
OK, I'll take up that challenge, as you might expect G
Why should someone who had 24 hr
From: "IG", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I can just about wear the argument that there MIGHT be some people who could
make out a case for carrying a firearm for protection. I am not too sure
what the circumstances might be, but if that was the case, I would consider
that various things would need to be
10 matches
Mail list logo
