From: "John Hurst.", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why do my chickens thrash about when I have severed the spine? They
thrash their wings for up to a minute, with considerable force, despite
the complete severance of the spine.
Steve,
Good point. Looking about it from the head end, there is a
From: "Tim Jeffreys", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
A police source said they found "enough weapons to
start a war" at the semi-detached cottage
I seem to recall that some rather large dust-up in 1914 was largely started
by a young chap with one pistol...
Cybershooters website:
From: "D.F.Mallard", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vince Steve
According to TAS Warminster drawing SDS 003 Centrefire Pistol NDA Range, the
ammunition limitations are:
Max calibre 0.455 inch
Max muzzle velocity 1675 feet/sec
Max muzzle energy 1496 foot/lbs
Hope this helps.
Mally
Cybershooters
From: N J Francis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simply because people _want_ something banned is never a particularly
good reason to ban something. There must be a _reason_ to ban it.
As the handgun ban amptly demonstrated. There was no sensible reason
to ban them so not surprisingly it didn't
From: Neil Francis, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As over 75% of people in the UK cannot stand the silly game of Foot Ball
Completely and utterly incorrect. You have just made this statistic up
haven't you?
-
Neil Francis
Trowbridge, UK
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Pete Ansbro, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can someone kindly identify these markings for me please?
RORG (Royal Ordnance something or other?)
89 (or possibly 68 but unlikely)
A circle containing a cross of St George
I'm guessing it to be a military .223 case.
TIA
Pete
--
Standard military
From: "matthew.wright7", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re. Richard and Neils comments:
Why do the scruffy ordinary Joes always following on foot or in their
cars. Why are the scruffy ordinary Joes never riding to the hounds? I put
it to you the scruffy ordinary Joes would soon go find something else to
From: Peter H Jackson, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vince,
From the Y2k Bisley Bible, rule 165:
Calibre .23" to .455", MV 2,150 ft/sec and ME 1,496 ft lbs, (same
as the Army limit for outdoor c-f pistol ranges).
Rgds, Peter.
www.jacksonrifles.com
Cybershooters website: http://www.cybershooters.org
From: "Andrew Chastney", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Why have you never ridden?
Because a serious accident I was involved in years ago has
left me incapable of sitting with my back unsupported for
anything
more than a few minutes without debilitating pain. Whether it's
a
saddle, a stool or a bale of
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
According to TAS Warminster drawing SDS 003 Centrefire Pistol NDA Range, the
ammunition limitations are:
Max calibre 0.455 inch
Max muzzle velocity 1675 feet/sec
Max muzzle energy 1496 foot/lbs
Damn! I suppose this excludes one of Peter Sarony's cute
From: Norman Bassett, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
You had teeth? Why, during the Great War the Germans
reckoned 40% of the British Army should have been in
sanitoriums because of malnutrition. Teeth? The Army
chest X-rays showed NO SKELETON AT ALL with some of
the men - on dissection they had a
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
a) Just because you find something distasteful is not a good
enough reason to prevent other people who happen to enjoy that
activity from engaging in it.
But if - say - 70% of the country find it distasteful - does it become
reasonable to look at preventing that
From: "John Hurst.", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hunters put the screws to a bird called the Passenger Pigeon. It went
extinct about 1900. I remember reading about it as a youth in disbelief. I
thought surely it couldn't have been hunters it must have been habitat loss.
Being a hunter I have always
From: John Howat, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there anyone out there who has done the basic work to
produce a CofF* for (a) Practical Pistol Shooting and (b)
UIT (ISSF) 25m shooting??
Here in New Zealand this information is now reqired to prove
the safety of military ranges if they are to be used by
From: "Alex Hamilton", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Steve,
In response to email written by Richard Loweth about justification of
foxhunting, you wrote:-
--
My response to all arguments against hunting no matter how reasoned
is that most people don't reason, in fact most people don't care,
except the
From: "John Hurst.", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now you see _this_ is what Section 5(1)(b) of the Firearms Act 1968
was intended for. ;)
Steve,
I take your rhetorical point but the debates on the Firearms Act
of 1920 which the '68 Act amends refereed to "deathless gas" being used for
From: "bob blake", [EMAIL PROTECTED]
While defending an individuals rights to wear what they like, I do, however,
consider that those, who insist on wearing camo gear on range, to be doing
the sport a grave dis-service. To use cost and warmth and suitability as an
excuse is nonsense, try
17 matches
Mail list logo
