Please keep replies on-list.
And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good
or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a few folk use in
cygwin already - i.e. robots.
Other things also build smoothly - ie squid, grep, ls, sh-utils, bash,
to name a few. So
--- Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please keep replies on-list.
sorry, sometimes mail comes with the list address in From:,
but not this time...
And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good
or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a few
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
Did someone think of developing a simple framework for making the packages,
especially for that software which supports Cygwin and configure does everything
for you?
Concurrent Version Systems has an autobuild package. I haven't looked
at it yet, just found it
Stanislav Sinyagin wrote:
As for the packaging, the most annoing thing (only imho, I've built only
one package, much less than you folks) was setting correctly all
the path names in configure options, and then packing it all with a proper
file name.
Did someone think of developing a simple
Ok, gang,
I finally got the time to finish up the build so that I had all
the pieces defined in the contributor's document. It is now
ready for upload.
--
Prentis Brooks | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | 703-265-0914 | AIM: PrentisBrooks
Senior System Administrator - Web
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 11:53:58PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
Please keep replies on-list.
And? Your points below don't give any rational that means NASM is good
or bad to include. There are lots of things that only a few folk use in
cygwin already - i.e. robots.
Other things also build
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote:
Ok, gang,
I finally got the time to finish up the build so that I had all
the pieces defined in the contributor's document. It is now
ready for upload.
Can you repost the setup.hint? Chuck made some
Stanislav Sinyagin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Did someone think of developing a simple framework for making the
packages, especially for that software which supports Cygwin and
configure does everything for you?
Not a simple script, but I've built a cardhouse of scripts that setup
a
Not a problem, here it is:
# TCP Wrappers
sdesc: TCP Wrappers, Tool to provide host based access restrictions in
tcp services
ldesc: TCP Wrappers, With this package you can monitor and filter
incoming
requests for the SYSTAT, FINGER, FTP, TELNET, RLOGIN, RSH, EXEC, TFTP,
TALK,
and other network
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:09:57AM -0500, Prentis Brooks wrote:
Ok, gang,
I finally got the time to finish up the build so that I had all
the pieces defined in the contributor's document. It is now
ready for upload.
Can you
I was having some problems uploading to my website, but the script is now
available in http://home.ix.netcom.com/~mchase/zip/clean_lst.zip .
I added a wrapper script to make it easier to use. It works fine for me,
but someone else should try it before we unleash it on the general public.
--
Mac
Hallo Lapo,
Am 2002-03-20 um 14:42 schriebst du:
As for NASM, I've seen only one program which uses it (and can compile
without it too) -- that's Lame. Are there more? Perhaps, some hardware
related tools, like CD-R burning? Video processing?
At least UCL/UPX which is to be packaged
Hallo Jim,
Am 2002-03-19 um 16:47 schriebst du:
I kinda thought the people at nasm.2y.net were doing a good job of
maintaining it
A Cygwin maintainer is one who cares about inclusion of a package in
the Cygwin dist. I don't find a Cygwin binary at this site, but thank
you anyway since I
Prentis Brooks wrote:
Hmm. I wonder if it would be worthwhile to make the wrapper library a
DLL.
I would rather we didn't, primarily because the modification to make tcp
wrappers work with Cygwin was simplistic. In fact, at this point the
modification is only to the Makefile, plus a
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:09:33PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
(In the old days, making a DLL required intrusive and exhausting changes
to lots and lots of source files -- __declspec(dllexport) this,
__declspec(dllexport that)... -- but no longer.) With auto-import
binutils, and the
Hrmmm I will look into it, I am sure there is some efficiency gained
from making it a DLL. Would packages that are built against libwrap
automatically use the DLL if it is available, or would they need to be
tweaked as well (ie sshd is compiled such that if libwrap.a is available
it will use
On Wed, 20 Mar 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:09:33PM -0500, Charles Wilson wrote:
(In the old days, making a DLL required intrusive and exhausting changes
to lots and lots of source files -- __declspec(dllexport) this,
__declspec(dllexport that)... -- but no
I had the opportunity to install cygwin from scratch today and
decided to do a mad clicker install and see how far I could get with
that without adding any of my personal favorites (vim, ssh, etc.)
The only two things I really missed were a pager and an editor. You
*can* use the Windows more,
Prentis Brooks wrote:
Hrmmm I will look into it, I am sure there is some efficiency gained
from making it a DLL. Would packages that are built against libwrap
automatically use the DLL if it is available, or would they need to be
tweaked as well (ie sshd is compiled such that if
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:29:34PM -0600, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
And what the heck happened to my big white box?!?!? ;-)
I think I happened to it. I kept promising some art work but I could
never get my son to finish it.
It's basically a cygwin C with an otter lounging on the bottom. The C
Is anyone investigating the problem with /usr/lib/w32api problem in
setup.exe?
w32api is being created in c:/cygwin/usr/lib/w32api rather than
c:/cygwin/lib/w32api .
cgf
I'd like to remove 'diff' in favor of a new 'diffutils'?
Is there any way to do that without causing problems? Is
there anything new in setup.exe that would eliminate the
dreaded libncurses problem?
cgf
I will check this tonight.
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: /usr/lib/w32api problem in setup.exe needs immediate
investigation
Is anyone investigating the problem
-Original Message-
From: Christopher Faylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Any way to uninstall in new setup.exe?
I'd like to remove 'diff' in favor of a new 'diffutils'?
Is there any way to do that without
-Original Message-
From: Joshua Daniel Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:12 PM
1. Can the less package be put into base? It really does
seem essential.
No. But man should depend on less IMO. And that will suck less in
automatically.
ROb
Rob,
Alright if I start on bringing the chooser window into the wizard as another
page, now that the new version is out? Hopefully it won't be too big of a deal.
And what the heck happened to my big white box?!?!? ;-)
--
Gary R. Van Sickle
Brewer. Patriot.
From strube Mon Mar 18 11:27:45 2002
When an xterm (running bash) is killed, e.g. by twm menu or by exiting the
xinitrc, the bash survives in the background with PPID 1 and has to be killed
manually with kill -HUP. The only way to exit xterm neatly seems to be
calling exit in its shell.
Hello
I tried to compile on cygwin gnome-libs I got a configure: error
This is the error
checking for __db185_open in -ldb-3... no
configure: error: Your db library is missing db 1.85 compatibility
mode
I did install db-4.0.14 and I am still getting this configure: error
If any one could
/ Eli Kleinman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hello
|
| I tried to compile on cygwin gnome-libs I got a configure: error
| This is the error
|
| checking for __db185_open in -ldb-3... no
It seems to try db-3, db version 3?? if you have a libdb-4.* lying
around somewhere, maybe you should check why
Hi
Finally I the configure want with out a problem
But now I do a make and here are the errors that I get
X11 -lm -lz -lm
mkdir .libs
test: no: unknown operand
test: no: unknown operand
test: yes: unknown operand
test: no: unknown operand
test: yes: unknown operand
test: no: unknown operand
On Tue, Mar 12, 2002 at 09:30:05AM +0100, Ralf
Habacker wrote:
I have done some analysing work with this and with the
cygwin daemon (cygserver transport classes)
there may be a
way in the future to implement unix domain sockets with
named pipes which speed up unix domain sockets up to
Robert,
Responses interposed below.
At 22:55 2002-03-19, Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 12:15 PM
Robert,
This idea isn't really new.
I don't recall claiming it as 'new' .. just
Hello Andrew,
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 2:38:01 AM, you wrote:
AD I had set up anonymous ftp before and it was working find (probably
AD around 1.3.6). Now on 1.3.9 it doesn't seem to be working right. I've
What exactly isn't working ?
[snip]
AD ftpd : Win32 Process Id = 0x998 : Cygwin
Hello dave,
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 4:13:20 AM, you wrote:
d Hello,
d I just installed the latest cygwin using the new setup program and from
d an accessability standpoint it's great, all the graphics and icons have a
d textual description or the plus signs are signs not bmp files.
d
Randall,
responses inline..
-Original Message-
From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:34 PM
Well we still have that basic separate - bash's builtin's
for example.
If
it's not builtin, it needs a sub process.
That's not quite
I would certainly agree with you about that, but the fact remains, a lot
of code, that cygwin exists to ease the porting of, uses it. If the work
was done on fork itself, it would help speed-up a lot more that just
configure (or similar) scripts.
Stephano Mariani
-Original Message-
The new program (setup.exe vs. 2.194.2.15) looks great, but apparently in
the process to download file setup.ini, though all motions look successful,
the file is not stored to disk. After downloading the file, the setup.exe
program apparently attempts to open/read the file and the following
-Original Message-
From: Bill Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: cygwin install problems
The new program (setup.exe vs. 2.194.2.15) looks great, but
apparently in the process to download file setup.ini,
On Tuesday 19 Mar 02, Corinna Vinschen writes:
I've made several superstitious changes to /etc/passwd, /etc/group,
but the bottom line is I can now login (telnet and ssh) only with
ntsec set. If I disable ntsec, I get the usual:
System Process - Application Error : The application
Hi Randall,
Here's what I did: I used od -c to determine what are the actual
sequences generated by the keys I cared to map and then wrote
a .inputrc
file based on that.
ahh, this was the missing step. I never knew, what key code sequences could
be used to assign a function at the key
TEST RELEASE. PLEASE test that this new package works as expected and
doesn't break anything. Report eventual problems back to the list.
DESCRIPTION:
Keychain is an OpenSSH key manager, typically run from
~/.bash_profile. When run, it will make sure ssh-agent is running; if
not, it will start
package and automatically install the necessary dependencies is run `apt-get
It doesn't work automatically, it needs people creating and updating packages.
And as setup.exe cannot be avoided (dpkg would be a cygwin package itself and
would need an already installed system) thereis no big gain
*shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with cygwin without a
hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)
I see they're distributing a .tar.gz with some cygwin utility (cvs.exe,
cyggdbm.dll, cygwin1.dll, cygz.dll, ssh*.exe; of course withour sources) so
they indeed know of
Howdy...
I've installed cygwin (with all current packages, actually) and now my
XP laptop will not undock. The error is that a process in still using the
COM port, so I presume that there is some process monitoring the COM port
for hard-line telnet sessions or something. Does anyone know
-Original Message-
From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 10:01 PM
To: CygWin
Subject: Re: RFP: NASM
*shrug* they have a forum - the version compiles with
cygwin without a
hitch... most recent is 0.98.22 (I'm pretty sure)
I see
utilities packaged... who volunteers? 0=)
I think you just did :}.
Uh, I didn't realize it.. but your experience in dealing with people far
exceedes my own so you must be right.
I'll do it.
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (PGP X.509 keys available)
http://www.lapo.it (ICQ UIN:
Hi!
Wouln't be convenient to have a NASM package directly installable (ni
binary and in source) from Cygwin's setup.exe?
I would surely be useful for people that uses CygWin, which I think
includes some of NASM developers, judging from the
cvs-ssh-win32-cygwin.tar.gz file in your download page.
Neil,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 08:12:42PM -0330, Neil Zanella wrote:
I have the lastest cygwin with postgresql installed.
It seems like there is no $PGDATA directory. Anyone
know how to properly start the postmaster so that
the psql utility works properly:
psql: could not connect to
I take that back - I have found references to Emacs, but can anyone point me
in the right direction for a download site (hopefully with a few
instructions)?
Thanks!
Rob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf
Of Robert Mark Bram
Sent: Wednesday,
Hrmmm...
-rw-rw-rw-1 prentis Domain A 5060 Mar 18 19:23 bcs_1.4.tar.bz2
@ bcs
sdesc: Baseline Configuration System, Internet Services
category: Base
requires: cygwin bash openssh binutils
version: 1.4
install: latest/bcs/bcs_1.4.tar.bz2 5060
-rwxrwxrwx1 Administ Domain U48890
On Thursday 21 Mar 02, Robert Mark Bram writes:
I take that back - I have found references to Emacs, but can anyone point me
in the right direction for a download site (hopefully with a few
instructions)?
Since GNU Emacs is not a Cygwin application, such a query is off-topic
for this list. I
To my great surprise, the close(socket) operation
took EXTREMELY long. It
took 0.11 second (CPU usage was low), while this
operation under MinGW 1.1
on the same machine took only 0.00019 second. On
another Linux machine,
close took 0.43 second.
A solution may be in calling
The new (2.194.2.15) setup.exe is not behaving as I would
expect. In brief, it re-downloads the same
packages each time it is run. Details below.
Am I misunderstanding or is this a bug?
Environment:
NT4SP6a with fresh Cygwin install made on 15th March (with
previous setup.exe). This install
Stephano,
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 09:12:48PM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
Windows 2000 has no command.com.
Sure it does:
$ ls -l c:/WINNT/system32/command.com
-rwxrwxr-x1 Administ SYSTEM 50620 Jul 26 2000
c:/WINNT/system32/command.com
Whether or not someone would want
Hi,
Yes i do have bash installed.
Dave.
- Original Message -
From: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dave [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:53 AM
Subject: Re: new cygwin setup, great!
Hello dave,
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 4:13:20 AM, you
Strange... I do not seem to have that file (I checked three machines,
win2k Pro SP2, Win2k Pro SP1, WinXP Pro).
Stephano Mariani
-Original Message-
From: Jason Tishler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, 20 March 2002 2:27 PM
To: Stephano Mariani
Cc: 'Anthony P Praino';
/ dave [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hi,
| Yes i do have bash installed.
Where what and how is bash installed??
So what is your definition of 'run it', what do you do to try to run
it, and what happens then??
/Andy
--
The eye of the beholder rests on the beauty!
--
Unsubscribe
/ Stephano Mariani [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Strange... I do not seem to have that file (I checked three machines,
| win2k Pro SP2, Win2k Pro SP1, WinXP Pro).
Can be found on my Win2k Pro SP2, ahh well maybe something depending
on your shoesize or something, definetly nothing for cygwin ;-)
I am quite interested to figure out why... did you install your win2k
over an existing windows version or was it a clean install?
Mine was a clean install in each case with only the service packs and
some patches being added.
Thanks,
Stephano Mariani
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Rob,
More...
At 01:33 2002-03-20, Robert Collins wrote:
Randall,
responses inline..
-Original Message-
From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 7:34 PM
Well we still have that basic separate - bash's builtin's
for example.
If
Just out of curiosity, what's keeping PostgreSQL marked as test? I was under
the impression that the primary issue was a problem in the Cygwin 1.3.9 DLL
that was fixed in 1.3.10.
--Rick
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 01:03:53AM -0500, Rob Gibson wrote:
DLL version 1.3.10, running on Windows ME. I checked the message boards,
but did not see this.
Call this code X: {
alarm(2);
pause();
cout A;
alarm(4);
pause();
cout B;
alarm(4);
pause();
cout C;
Stephano,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:47:28PM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
I am quite interested to figure out why... did you install your win2k
over an existing windows version or was it a clean install?
Mine was a clean install in each case with only the service packs and
some patches
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 06:04:44PM +1100, Robert Collins wrote:
In fact cgf has had a copy-on-write fork() for cygwin in alpha-quality
IIRC. I'd love to do some perf tests with that, and in fact on my todo
list is cygwin profiling. Time however, is the killer.
This keeps coming up. Maybe it
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 09:37:42AM -, Stephano Mariani wrote:
I would certainly agree with you about that, but the fact remains, a
lot of code, that cygwin exists to ease the porting of, uses it. If
the work was done on fork itself, it would help speed-up a lot more
that just configure (or
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 10:10:53AM +, David Starks-Browning wrote:
ntsec on
uid=11024(starksb) gid=10513(Domain Users) groups=0(Everyone),545(Users),10513(Domain
Users)
ntsec off
~
uid=11024(starksb) gid=10513(Domain Users) groups=10513(Domain Users)
When ntsec is off, id
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 01:00:27PM +0100, Lapo Luchini wrote:
BTW: regarding that cvs-ssh-win32-cygwin.tar.gz file, IANAL but
regularly reading the cygwin mailing list I happen to have read that
distributing binaries without sources technically violates the GPL, as
the uses isn't gived the right
Hi,
Well, this doesn't seem to qualify as on-topic, but we've seen worse here...
I have COMMAND.COM on my Win2K SP2 system, for what it's worth. It was a
clean install on a newly formatted drive.
Perhaps it came along with the Windows 2000 Resource Kit, whose software I
also installed?
I'm going to have to say that discussion of why your W2K installation does
not command.com is off-topic for this list. Perhaps you can soothe your
curiosity with a discussion off-line. For the record, I have command.com
in my W2K installation and it was a clean install that I did myself.
HTH,
Mine was a clean install in each case with only the service packs and
some patches being added.
I installed it from scratch every time but the first (of course...) but
\winnt\system32\command.com is definitely there, in Win98 is
widows\command\command.com.. be it an upgrade of a from scratch.
Randall..
-Original Message-
From: Randall R Schulz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:47 AM
To: Robert Collins; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: OT: possible project/research project
No - sounds like you haven't been paying attention. In my very first
Rick,
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 08:22:52AM -0800, Rick Rankin wrote:
Just out of curiosity, what's keeping PostgreSQL marked as test?
Nothing but forgetfulness. If my head wasn't attached... :,)
I was under
the impression that the primary issue was a problem in the Cygwin 1.3.9 DLL
that was
Windows NT 4 is reporting an Application Error when I run Setup.Exe. The
error reads:
The instruction at 0x78001750 referenced memory at 0x20b078e9.
The memory could not be read.
At first the program runs fine. The splash screen identifies it as
setup.exe version 2.194.2.15. I then
Hmmm... Why did you email me personally? Keep it on the list! (I thought
I had set up the Followup-To or the Reply-To to handle this).
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Hello Andrew,
Wednesday, March 20, 2002, 2:38:01 AM, you wrote:
AD I had set up anonymous ftp before and it was working find (probably
Hello,
I am looking for crypt command in cygwin. It looks like, I have crypt
command , but it does not work like in Sun OS. I want to encrypt a file
using some password. How to do this in cygwin ?.
in Unix, I do this, but the same thing does not work in cygwin.
crypt mypassword /usr/filename
Lars Munch wrote:
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 04:57:36AM -0500, Oleg wrote:
Hi
I'm curious, how does everyone start cygwin? I use a shortcut
C:\cygwin\bin\rxvt.exe -sl 200 -fg white -bg black -geometry
110x43+0+0 -backspacekey ^H -fn 8x16 -e /bin/bash --login -i, starting in
C:\cygwin\bin (the
Robert Mark Bram wrote:
Howdy all!
Read the documentation.. made my .bashrc script!
Here it is so far:
function ll
{
ls -l
}
function m
{
man $1 | less
}
Why do you insist on piping the output of man to less? It's unnecessary
as man will use whatever is in PAGER.
Do you have C:\Cygwin\Bin in your Windows System Environment Variable
PATH? Have you rebooted since you've put it in your PATH?
Christopher Paulicka wrote:
Hello,
Sorry to bother you, but I am trying to get cron to
work on my Windows 2000 machine.
I installed cron as instructed here:
Your message :-
Re: OT: possible project/research project on Wed, 20 Mar 2002 11:46:59 -0500
has been trashed.
All e-mail from you has been barred permanently from
being received by any e-mail addresses at this site -
please take your spam and numerous mailing list to
which I have never
Hallo Christopher,
Am 2002-03-18 um 21:34 schriebst du:
When I try to start it, I get an error from the
Microsoft Management Console:
Could not start the cron service on Local Computer.
The service did not return an error. This could be an
internal Windows error or an internal service
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 14:02:34 +0900, Dylan Cuthbert
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm.. I noticed some talk on a mailing list somewhere about problems with
locales... could it be to do with input streams trying to look up locale
info and getting null ptrs as a result?
I'll try compiling libstdc++-v3
From: Edward M. Lee edward at tailifer dot com
To: 'Jeremy Hetzler' felixmendelssohnn at earthlink dot net
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:42:38 -0500
Try removing the ./ from the w32api-1.2.1.tar.bz2 package, then
reinstall.
Or just tar -C / path/to/w32api-1.2.1.tar.bz2
I don't understand.
The encryption and decryption has to be done inside a shell script, so I
can't use vi -x filename. Is there any other way ?
Thanks
you culd use vi -x file name
then it asks you for a key
next time you view the file you have to enter the crypth key
Mailing-List: contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]; run
I do have Ruby installed, and there is a copy of cygwin1.dll in the c:\ruby
directory.
-Luke
- Original Message -
From: David Starks-Browning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Luke J Crook [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 3:20 PM
Subject: ./config -luser32
Check out the FAQ like David mentioned.
Keep things the way you have them if that's your preference but don't expect
help from the list when you run into troubles. Cygwin won't work with two or
more copies of it's DLL on the same system so unless you're adventurous (or
masochistic), you'll
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 03:28:46PM -0800, Luke J Crook wrote:
From: Edward M. Lee edward at tailifer dot com
To: 'Jeremy Hetzler' felixmendelssohnn at earthlink dot net
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2002 22:42:38 -0500
Try removing the ./ from the w32api-1.2.1.tar.bz2 package, then
reinstall.
Or
Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
Ruby, and deleted everythin in the the c:\Cygwin directory. I decided to
start from scratch.
However, even after re-installing Cygwin, I still have the same problem as I
described previously... ld can't find -luser32. Could
No, as Chris pointed out, setup is fine. Check your environment again. You
have some environment variable set wrong (for some other reason) or you're not
using the gcc you think you are or some other such thing. Of course if you
still get the complaint about a bad volume when you run
I reported a similar error with Windows98 a few days ago; same general
scenerio in that it starts fine until the Downloading part and then
throws an exception. I sent along the CPU dump that Win98 provides.
Elizabeth
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Bug
Yes, you didn't use the prescribed method to install it.
http://cygwin.com/setup.exe
Earnie.
C. Han wrote:
Sorry to bother you but I thought maybe you could help me with this
I got gcc package 2.95.3-5 and whenever i try to compile something it
gives me a error of cannot find -luser32
Hi
I have a problem with make (2.79.1) and latest cygwin1.dll (Win 2000 SP2):
I have a makefile that looks like this:
OUTPUT=C:\cygwin\TesteGNU\TesteGNU.exe
OBJS=main.o
C:\cygwin\TesteGNU\TesteGNU.exe: $(OBJS)
C:\cygwin\bin\ld.exe -Bstatic -T C:\cygwin\lib\ldscripts\i386pe.xn \
-o $ \
This is strange! Why did this happen? I posted it but Oliver Nittka is
listed as the poster. Then the odd mail headers and to the wrong
subject. Hmmm... Mysterious...
Oliver Nittka wrote:
Organization: Salira Optical Networks
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US;
Larry Hall (RFK Partners, Inc) wrote:
The short answer is the answer is in the email archives.
Not really. All the below reference says is that this is intentional,
not why it's being done. My question was why.
See:
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/2001-11/msg01018.html
There's
At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
Ruby, and deleted everythin in the the c:\Cygwin directory. I decided to
start from scratch.
However, even after re-installing Cygwin, I still have the same problem as I
On Thu, Mar 21, 2002 at 02:15:43AM +0100, Oliver Nittka wrote:
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.184.204.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016672925 23930 206.184.204.2 (21 Mar 2002 01:08:45 GMT)
NNTP-Posting-Host: 206.184.204.2
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1016672925 23930 206.184.204.2 (21 Mar 2002 01:08:45 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 21 Mar 2002
At 08:56 PM 3/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
At 08:52 PM 3/20/2002, Dan Browning wrote:
At 05:36 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
Ruby, and deleted everythin in the the c:\Cygwin
On Wed, Mar 20, 2002 at 05:52:18PM -0800, Dan Browning wrote:
The c:\cygwin\usr\lib\w32api DOES actually exist in windows, but I could
not access that directory within the cygwin shell:
$ cd /usr/lib/w32api
bash: cd: /usr/lib/w32api: No such file or directory
However, if I copy
At 08:52 PM 3/20/2002, Dan Browning wrote:
At 05:36 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
Ruby, and deleted everythin in the the c:\Cygwin directory. I decided to
start from scratch.
At 06:09 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
At 08:56 PM 3/20/2002 -0500, you wrote:
At 08:52 PM 3/20/2002, Dan Browning wrote:
At 05:36 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, you wrote:
At 07:27 PM 3/20/2002, Luke J Crook wrote:
Thanks for the help guys, I read the the FAQ and have since uninstalled
Ruby, and
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
