Has my vote,
Just a small note, though: most of the OLOCA acronyms are a lot more verbose
than their wtf counterparts, and some of them are duplicates. would it be
possible to adapt your Perl script to weed out the (exact) duplicates?
JAT (*)
rlc
(*) JAT: Just A Thought - neither in wtf nor
Great, that makes 3 votes. Now all I have to do is get someone to review
the packaging (nudge, nudge, wink, wink).
I don't see a particular value in weeding out duplicates, as all variants
will be displayed, so no information is lost. However, I'll see if I
could hide the original acronyms...
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:56:57AM -0400, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Great, that makes 3 votes. Now all I have to do is get someone to review
the packaging (nudge, nudge, wink, wink).
FWIW, I've installed the binary - it seems to be working nicely. I've tried
bowth wtf and wtfindex.
I've also
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:59:56PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 17:23 schriebst du:
I am still unable to build Perl and I haven't found the problem yet.
I'm seeking for volunteers to help tracking down this problem.
I'm sorry
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:02:19PM -0400, Steve Coleman wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 11:59:56PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Am Samstag, 2. August 2003 um 17:23 schriebst du:
I am still unable to build Perl and I haven't found the problem yet.
I'm seeking for
Hi,
I maintain the cmake package. I have tested it, and it
only requires a recompile to work with cygwin 1.5.1.
I am not sure how to proceed. Should I create binaries that require 1.5.1, and
make them the -test version of the package. Then when 1.5.1 is
officially released on 2003-08-23, I
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Gottwald
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sun, August 03, 2003 11:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: No keyboard with XFree86 4.0.3
Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
Hi,
I just upgraded XFree86 to a latest 4.0.3 packages. Now,
when I run
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
please check if a file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XKeysymDB exists
and if a line
like these exists:
XF86_Switch_VT_1:1008FE01
It exists.
Since you're the only one with this Problem I suspect it's a problem
with the 1.5 release of cygwin.
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
I am all about baby steps. We haven't even proven that we know how to
start a new application for the user from the system tray icon yet.
Until we actually do that this discussion is really pointless.
I can send you code which spawns new
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, David Fraser wrote:
I can send you code which spawns new processes from a running windows app.
Could you send it to the list?
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Gottwald
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, August 04, 2003 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: No keyboard with XFree86 4.0.3
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
please check if a file /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/XKeysymDB
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
I suspect it caused by upgrade from 4.2.0 to 4.3.0, since I didn't have such
problem with X 4.2.0 and cygwin 1.5.1. I could not reproduce it on abother
computer , though.
There were several people who have upgraded to 4.3.0 too and have not reported
-Original Message-
From: Alexander Gottwald
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mon, August 04, 2003 12:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: No keyboard with XFree86 4.0.3
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Pavel Rozenboim wrote:
I suspect it caused by upgrade from 4.2.0 to 4.3.0, since
Harold,
I downloaded the XFIXES_BRANCH but when I tried to compile it I got:
make[4]: Leaving directory
`/home/u752359/x-devel/build/std/programs/Xserver/XTrap'
cleaning in programs/Xserver/xfixes...
cd: can't cd to xfixes
cleaning in programs/Xserver/hw/xwin...
make[4]: Entering directory
JS,
Okay, it looks like you are using my suggested directory structure from
the Contributor's Guide. Does this mean that you have XFIXES_BRANCH
somewhere like:
/home/u752359/x-devel/xc/
?
If so, had you had a previous branch, say HEAD, at:
/home/u752359/x-devel/xc/
?
Yes? Good. That
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, David Fraser wrote:
I can send you code which spawns new processes from a running windows app.
Could you send it to the list?
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command =
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe -display :0.0;
That line and comment are really the crux of my whole argument. It is
simple to spawn a process.
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe -display :0.0;
That line and comment are really the crux of my whole argument. It is
simple
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:03:37PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe -display
:0.0;
That line
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:03:37PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Alexander Gottwald wrote:
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
/* we must build this string with information about mount points */
const char* command = c:\\cygwin\\usr\\x11r6\\xterm.exe
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:22:33PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
Huh. Seems like a no-brainer to me. It's a cygwin program so why not
use fork/exec? Then Xwin will be able to use 'wait()' to
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:22:33PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
Huh. Seems like a no-brainer to me. It's a cygwin program so why not
use fork/exec? Then Xwin will
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:58:06PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:22:33PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
Huh. Seems like a no-brainer to me.
Chris,
We discussed this back in May/June. Suhaib mailed me the CDs of his
initial work in June as a result of the discussion. I have the CDs, so
I don't need to check the archives for proof here. Of course, since
then I have been rather tied up with things (wedding, moving, etc.).
End of
Start-Run
c:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin\run /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -display :0
YES! , this works perfectly. Now could this be added
as a right click menu option to the tray?
I'd thought about suggesting this before, but I decided against it: it
is bad UI. Windows already has a method of starting
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:21:12PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
We discussed this back in May/June. Suhaib mailed me the CDs of his
initial work in June as a result of the discussion. I have the CDs, so
I don't need to check the archives for proof here. Of course, since
then I have been
Right to all of that, but I am really busy at work right now and this is
precisely the sort of discussion that I don't have time to partake in at
the moment.
Harold
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 01:21:12PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
We discussed this back in May/June.
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:17:24PM -0400, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Right to all of that, but I am really busy at work right now and this
is precisely the sort of discussion that I don't have time to partake
in at the moment.
That's ok. I'm done. You can just ignore anything I said. It's your
/ Jack Tanner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
|Start-Run
|c:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin\run /usr/X11R6/bin/xterm -display :0
| YES! , this works perfectly. Now could this be added
| as a right click menu option to the tray?
or hmm during setup of the packages, add an icon for X-server, and
local xterm, to
OR,
paste the following into a batch file, then put an icon to the batch
file on your desktop (or your start menu, etc... the possibilities are
endless!).
@echo off
set path=%PATH%;C:\cygwin\bin
cd c:\cygwin\home
c:\cygwin\usr\X11R6\bin\run xterm -display :0.0 -e bash --login
Andrew Markebo
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
I'd not set any conditions. If one implements it with fork or with
CreateProcess is quite unimportant.
bye
ago
BTW:
I'd prefer CreateProcess as it bypasses the
Hi,
there is a little problem with gcc 2.95.x. In some files I've got a compiling
error like mentioned below:
wingc.c: In function `winValidateGCNativeGDI':
wingc.c:155: parse error before `fDebugProcMsg'
wingc.c:156: `fDebugProcMsg' undeclared (first use in this function)
wingc.c:156: (Each
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:01:57PM +0200, Alexander Gottwald wrote:
Harold L Hunt II wrote:
Depends on if we use Cygwin's fork or Window's CreateProcess. We
haven't made that decision yet.
I'd not set any conditions. If one implements it with fork or with
CreateProcess is quite unimportant.
The web link for (the binary) of
the newest test server series v (95) is pointing to
test version (94)
Hi,
I'm porting an application from linux to cygwin.
I upgraded from xfree 4.2 to 4.3 and now xft code list no fonts.
It did in 4.2. I tried fontconfig, since that is now available,
but it also doesn't list any fonts. I notice that in 4.2 there
was an XftConfig in /etc/X11, but there isn't in
Jack,
Thanks. Let me tell you, we already have a laundry list of dream
features. We just need people to start working on them.
Harold
Jack Tanner wrote:
This is a pipe dream, but it's a pipe dream worth striving for.
1. X should run as a service. There's no reason for it to run as a
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 06:11:17PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Sat, Aug 02, 2003 at 01:53:21PM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Here is a simple patch which makes the behaviour of getmntent ()
consistent with the one of fhandler_cygdrive.
The reason this is there is to avoid long delays in mount
Perfect answer, thank you! I moved the COBJMACROS definition to the top
of the file and was able to remove the #include objidl.h entirely, so
clearly it's being included by some other file.
Thanks!
Rob
Original Message
Subject: Re: #define question
Date: Fri, 01 Aug 2003
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf
Of Gerrit P. Haase
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 10:33 PM
-- LATE ADDITION --
Before I begin:
Please! Don't reply to this.
This is just my way of getting some frustration off my shoulders.
No offence intended nor implied.
-- E.O.A.
Gerrit,
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 10:32:58PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Am Sonntag, 3. August 2003 um 18:54 schriebst du:
As Jason points out in the release notes, even after being rebased,
Python cannot pass any of the threads or
^^ Python also cannot be built with Cygwin 1.5.1?
I
FWIW, the problem I reported in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-07/msg01057.html
seems to have gone away in current Cygwin CVS HEAD
JTYMLTK (*)
rlc
* JTYMLTK: Just Thought You Might Like To Know - useful addition to the OLOCA?
--
--
Unsubscribe info:
Hi,
Ok, something else to try. From sh, try:
$ d:/cygwin/bin/cat /etc/passwd
$ /cygdrive/d/cygwin/bin/cat /etc/passwd
Does either command work?
Nope:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~
$ sh
\[\033]0;\w\007
[EMAIL PROTECTED] \[\033[33m\w\033[0m\]
$ d:/cygwin/bin/cat /etc/passwd
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 12:25:43AM +0100, Max Bowsher wrote:
Seth Rubin wrote:
Myself (and Jason) are thinking there's an issue with the cygwin
setup. Maybe I'm being naive, but all this seems is an issue with
chmod and/or copy not being done properly on the postgres.exe file
during
Hello,
Below is the output from getfacl:
# file: /usr/bin/tbl
# owner: Administrators
# group: mkgroup_l_d
user::---
group::---
mask:rwx
other:---
# file: /bin/cat
# owner: Administrators
# group: mkgroup_l_d
user::---
group::---
mask:rwx
other:---
# file:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 12:54:38PM -0400, Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Perl-5.8 is not working at all on WinME and, despite my best efforts,
I am unable to debug the problem because the race condition happens
before the dubugger can hook. As Jason points out in the release
notes, even after being
stuart gear wrote:
On Mon, Aug 4, 2003 Christopher Faylor wrote:
So, I use ansi as an example of an incorrect TERM setting and you set
the TERM to ansi.
I tried a couple of term settings and nothing changed. I tried ansi and
suddenly I am able to type and move around, so I left it there.
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:32:18PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
FWIW, the problem I reported in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-07/msg01057.html
seems to have gone away in current Cygwin CVS HEAD
current Cygwin CVS HEAD meaning what? Is it fixed in 1.5.1? Is it fixed in
the
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:33:16AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:32:18PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
FWIW, the problem I reported in
http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2003-07/msg01057.html
seems to have gone away in current Cygwin CVS HEAD
current
FWIW, it's fixed in 1.5.1
HTH
rlc
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:33:16AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:32:18PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
FWIW, the problem I reported in
When (re)compiling some of my packages, I noticed that (some) signals
are not being propagated to children.
That is:
$ ./my-package-ver-rel.sh build
Hit ^C
I'm returned to my bash prompt, but the make continues in the background.
--
Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:33:16AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:32:18PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
FWIW, the problem I reported in
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 10:27:19AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:09:09PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:33:16AM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:32:18PM +0200, Ronald Landheer-Cieslak wrote:
FWIW, the
Hallo Christopher,
Am Montag, 4. August 2003 um 03:38 schriebst du:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 09:29:49PM -0400, Samuel Thibault wrote:
At
http://youpibouh.thefreecat.org/cygwin/ftw.c
http://youpibouh.thefreecat.org/cygwin/ftw.h
an almost unmodified version of newlib/libc/sys/linux/ftw.c can be
It looks as if thinstall.com got rooted. I hope that this was not a
Cygwin user as this is a very nasty thing to do.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ:
hi,
i read http://cygwin.com/cygwin-ug-net/using-cygwinenv.html and searched
for a flag that turns of CRLF conversion. For example setxkbmap.exe from
the XFree packages still crashes if i CRLF conversion is globally turned
on with cygwin's setup.exe. I could put any entry into the Registry to
I have seen this as well. Difficult to reproduce (seems to work
correctly 99% of the time). I was running a 1.5.0 snapshot (from
several weeks ago) when I saw it.
Charles Wilson wrote:
When (re)compiling some of my packages, I noticed that (some) signals
are not being propagated to
Ville,
At 10:33 2003-08-03, Ville Herva wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 12:24:33AM -0400, you [Norman Vine] wrote:
Marcus G. Daniels writes:
Incidentally, does anyone know of a Windows application that can be used
to see the VM maps in a given process.
(Like in Linux, with
Hi,
I am a newbie in this. I am trying to install latest cygwin on Windows
2000. I have used Cygwin DLL release version 1.3.22-1.
While installing the cygwin, the some of the post-install scripts gave
me this message:
The procedure entry point __getreent could not be located in the
dynamic
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 04:54:21PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo Christopher,
Am Montag, 4. August 2003 um 03:38 schriebst du:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 09:29:49PM -0400, Samuel Thibault wrote:
At
http://youpibouh.thefreecat.org/cygwin/ftw.c
http://youpibouh.thefreecat.org/cygwin/ftw.h
an
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:55:15AM -0700, Kishor Kulkarni wrote:
I am a newbie in this. I am trying to install latest cygwin on Windows
2000. I have used Cygwin DLL release version 1.3.22-1.
While installing the cygwin, the some of the post-install scripts gave
me this message:
The procedure
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:20:01AM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
I have seen this as well. Difficult to reproduce (seems to work
correctly 99% of the time). I was running a 1.5.0 snapshot (from
several weeks ago) when I saw it.
And I've seen this on linux as well. I guess I should send email
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:09:34AM -0700, Kishor Kulkarni wrote:
Thanks Christopher!!
But where (and which) is the LATEST version of cygwin1.dll ?
On rethinking this, it sounds like you included test versions of some
program or library and you have a version mismatch between the cygwin
DLL and
Hallo Christopher,
Am Montag, 4. August 2003 um 18:01 schriebst du:
There is a ftw.c ftw.h included in the wu-ftpd sources in the
support directory, BSD licensed:
* Copyright (c) 1988 Regents of the University of California.
* All rights reserved.
http://anfaenger.de/ftw/ftw.c
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 06:42:31PM +0200, Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Am Montag, 4. August 2003 um 18:01 schriebst du:
Just to be clear: I'm not volunteering to do any work on this other
than offer opinions on whether the code is appropriate for inclusion
for cygwin.
And, is this BSD version
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 09:09:34AM -0700, Kishor Kulkarni wrote:
Thanks Christopher!!
But where (and which) is the LATEST version of cygwin1.dll ?
On rethinking this, it sounds like you included test versions of some
program or library and you have a version mismatch
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 11:20:01AM -0400, Rolf Campbell wrote:
I have seen this as well. Difficult to reproduce (seems to work
correctly 99% of the time). I was running a 1.5.0 snapshot (from
several weeks ago) when I saw it.
And I've seen
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
FWIW, I've seen this in 1.3.22 (with both tty and notty), so it's not
a regression.
Okay, if it's not a regression then it is not a 1.5.1 issue per se.
Party on, dudes.
As far as seen this on linux -- I had never seen it before(*) on linux
or cygwin, so I thought I'd
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 02:36:10PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
FWIW, I've seen this in 1.3.22 (with both tty and notty), so it's
not a regression.
Okay, if it's not a regression then it is not a 1.5.1 issue per se.
Party on, dudes.
As far as seen this on linux -- I had
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:35:57 -0400, Jason Tishler wrote:
The attached *may* be affecting threads under Perl too. Specifically,
the following:
pthread_cond::Signal: Released too many threads - X now X originally
I'm willing to work with the Cygwin pthreads developers to help track
Hello,
On rxvt startup two utmp entries are created - the first one is created by
Cygwin and
the second one is created by rxvt itself:
$ who
Administ tty1 Aug 5 01:26 (MORDOR)
Administ tty2 Aug 5 01:26 (:0)
After rxvt shutdown:
$ who
Administ tty2 Aug 5 01:26 (:0)
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Aug 03, 2003 at 09:29:49PM -0400, Samuel Thibault wrote:
At
http://youpibouh.thefreecat.org/cygwin/ftw.c
http://youpibouh.thefreecat.org/cygwin/ftw.h
an almost unmodified version of newlib/libc/sys/linux/ftw.c can be found
along its header.
These come from the
Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
Hallo Nicholas,
[SNIP]
Perl-5.8 is not working at all on WinME and, despite my best efforts, I
am unable to debug the problem because the race condition happens
before the dubugger can hook. As Jason points out in the release notes,
even after being rebased, Python
Hello,
Would you please tell me where to find the unix equivalent of script command
for capturing screen outputs?
I did compile the one from Redhat linux in misc-util but failed.
Appreciated your help.
Thanks,
Tony
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 03:02:51AM +0200, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
The description of the --change-cygdrive-prefix option states that By
default, the cygdrive-prefix applies only to the current user.
Currently, mount changes by defult the system prefix.
Hmm. I thought I had nuked all of these. Guess
Robert Citek wrote:
A chemist friend of mine at the FDA has some questions about Cygwin and how
it interacts with Windows. Below is his e-mail message to me which he
asked to forward to the list if I felt it would help. I have some
questions of my own to ask him, but thought I would put it
Ville Herva wrote:
On Fri, Aug 01, 2003 at 12:11:49PM -0400, you [Larry Hall] wrote:
Please *attach* your cygcheck output next time rather than including
it in the text of your message.
Sorry.
I suggest the following two changes.
1. Remove 'ntea' from your CYGWIN environment variable.
Matthew O. Persico wrote:
A plug for http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/ (hopefully read by newbies)
And if you can't get htdig (or whatever that form uses) to grok your
search, there's also google. I've found that you can search just
mailing-list archives with google by prepending
A plug for http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/ (hopefully read by newbies)
While trying to build a package, I got an error on gcc switch -fnative-sources. I
pumped that into the search engine at the mail archives and the first entry that
popped up had the solution in
the summary - didn't even
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 07:45:33PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
Matthew O. Persico wrote:
A plug for http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/ (hopefully read by
newbies)
And if you can't get htdig (or whatever that form uses) to grok your
search, there's also google. I've found that you can search
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003, Brian Dessent wrote:
Matthew O. Persico wrote:
A plug for http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/ (hopefully read by newbies)
And if you can't get htdig (or whatever that form uses) to grok your
search, there's also google. I've found that you can search just
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 06:34:24PM -0700, Brian Dessent wrote:
Robert Citek wrote:
A chemist friend of mine at the FDA has some questions about Cygwin and
how it interacts with Windows. Below is his e-mail message to me which
he asked to forward to the list if I felt it would help. I have some
On Mon, Aug 04, 2003 at 08:58:46PM -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Given the good problem description and the simple test case, this shouldn't
be hard to fix. I'll see what I can do. The behavior that you've described
has bugged me for a while. I'm glad that you tracked down what was going on.
Nicholas Wourms wrote:
Plus, I don't care *at all* for
all that colorful shit in XP. It looks like that stuff is part of the
new UI, so the prospects of getting rid of that crap looks slim.
FWIW, it's very simple to make all that go away in XP. You just choose
the Windows Classic setting
83 matches
Mail list logo
