Re: cp: skipping file 'file', as it was replaced while being copied

On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 5:46 PM, Larry Hall (Cygwin) > wrote: >> On 05/11/2016 08:14 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: >>> >>> Hi; >>> >>>cp: skipping file 'file', as it was

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 13:38, Marco Atzeri wrote: All these are arch independent as contain only scripts (for the time being) octave-bim octave-bsltl octave-cgi octave-data-smoothing octave-dataframe octave-divand octave-financial octave-fpl octave-fuzzy-logic-toolkit octave-ga octave-generate_html

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 15:35, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 12:26, Ken Brown wrote: texlive-collection-fontsextra texlive-collection-fontsrecommended texlive-collection-genericextra texlive-collection-genericrecommended texlive-collection-langafrican texlive-collection-langarabic

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 17:30, Ken Brown wrote: On 5/11/2016 6:17 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 16:55, Ken Brown wrote: On 5/11/2016 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: I haven't moved these yet, but what about the rest of the collections? IIRC the TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS do have CPU-cygwin paths in

Re: [ITP] python-configobj 5.0.6 (4.7.2 is in Cygwin Ports)

On 2016-05-06 08:15, Mike DePaulo wrote: This package is currently in Cygwin Ports at version 4.7.2-2, as well as in major distros like Fedora & Debian. The 5.0.x series has a new upstream. They also removed the PKG-INFO file. The sources on PyPI -- which you get if you drop SRC_URI -- still

Re: cp: skipping file 'file', as it was replaced while being copied

On 05/11/2016 08:14 PM, Kenneth Wolcott wrote: Hi; cp: skipping file 'file', as it was replaced while being copied I have several mounted partitions on my Windows machine (64bit Windows 7). Copying a file using cygwin cp , via mintty, from a mounted drive to a local path, I

cp: skipping file 'file', as it was replaced while being copied

Hi; cp: skipping file 'file', as it was replaced while being copied I have several mounted partitions on my Windows machine (64bit Windows 7). Copying a file using cygwin cp , via mintty, from a mounted drive to a local path, I frequently get the aforementioned message. Is the

perl-PAR-Packer

Yaakov, I needed the latest version of perl-PAR-Packer, so I built it and discovered that I needed the attached patch. It just adds back a line that was present prior to version 1.030. The build fails with "undefined reference to `__stack_chk_fail'" without that line. I'm not suggesting

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 5/11/2016 6:17 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 16:55, Ken Brown wrote: On 5/11/2016 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: I haven't moved these yet, but what about the rest of the collections? IIRC the TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS do have CPU-cygwin paths in the "sources", but are they *really*

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 16:55, Ken Brown wrote: On 5/11/2016 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: I haven't moved these yet, but what about the rest of the collections? IIRC the TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS do have CPU-cygwin paths in the "sources", but are they *really* archful? No, the only issue is the sources.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 5/11/2016 4:35 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: I haven't moved these yet, but what about the rest of the collections? IIRC the TEXLIVE_ARCH_PKGS do have CPU-cygwin paths in the "sources", but are they *really* archful? No, the only issue is the sources. As it stands, if someone downloads the

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 16:02, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 11/05/2016 22:48, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: But what about the following? octave-nan octave-octcdf octave-stk octave-tsa /usr/lib/octave/packages/ contains the arch specific in this case in mex variant. Oops, it seems cygport knows nothing of this,

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 11/05/2016 22:48, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 13:38, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 11/05/2016 00:11, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Package Maintainers, Once you have upgraded to cygport 0.22.0, maintainers MUST email a list of their package(s) which qualify as noarch AND are already marked

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 12:26, Ken Brown wrote: On 5/10/2016 6:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Once you have upgraded to cygport 0.22.0, maintainers MUST email a list of their package(s) which qualify as noarch AND are already marked ARCH=noarch or will be with the next release. bzr-fastimport biber

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 11:26, David Stacey wrote: On 11/05/16 07:17, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 00:07, Marco Atzeri wrote: So at this stage not the documentation subpackages, but only if all subpackages are in this category. correct ? At this time we are only considering those where all

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 12:56, Marco Atzeri wrote: On 11/05/2016 08:17, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 00:07, Marco Atzeri wrote: So at this stage not the documentation subpackages, but only if all subpackages are in this category. correct ? At this time we are only considering those where all

[PATCH calm] past_mistakes: remove dialog, ncurses, xfs

The versions containing hyphens are no longer present. --- past_mistakes.py | 16 1 file changed, 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/past_mistakes.py b/past_mistakes.py index d8280d1..5e1132f 100644 --- a/past_mistakes.py +++ b/past_mistakes.py @@ -30,8 +30,6 @@ # package names which

Re: add fish to /etc/shells (base-files)

> While I'm always ready to reconsider previous decisions, this is how it > appears to be handled in Linux distros. The implication thereof is that > (once all packages have been adapted) the default /etc/shells should > only contain those shells available by default (namely, sh, bash, and >

Re: add fish to /etc/shells (base-files)

On 2016-05-11 12:09, Andrew Schulman wrote: Am 10.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Andrew Schulman: Achim, can you please add /bin/fish and /usr/bin/fish to /etc/shells in base-files? I seem to remember that this was discussed before. If you could perhaps look up that discussion and fill me in what

Re: Dedup x86/x86_64 --> noarch

On 10/05/2016 07:20, Andrew Schulman wrote: If this is what's happened, we need to update https://cygwin.com/setup.html with the new information (the page is overdue for an overhaul anyway). I agree that page is very bad at communicating the information it needs to communicate. Perhaps it

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 11/05/2016 00:11, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Package Maintainers, Once you have upgraded to cygport 0.22.0, maintainers MUST email a list of their package(s) which qualify as noarch AND are already marked ARCH=noarch or will be with the next release. (Note that inheriting cross.cygclass

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 11:36, Eric Blake wrote: Question: can cygport be enhanced to validate and/or have heuristics for this? Possibly, I'd have to consider how exactly. For example, cygport already has a pass that strips/separates debuginfo out of binaries compiled by gcc - if any stripping occurs,

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 11/05/2016 08:17, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 00:07, Marco Atzeri wrote: So at this stage not the documentation subpackages, but only if all subpackages are in this category. correct ? At this time we are only considering those where all subpackages are noarch, i.e. ARCH=noarch

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 5/10/2016 6:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: Once you have upgraded to cygport 0.22.0, maintainers MUST email a list of their package(s) which qualify as noarch AND are already marked ARCH=noarch or will be with the next release. bzr-fastimport biber emacs-auctex texlive-collection-basic-doc

Re: add fish to /etc/shells (base-files)

> Am 10.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Andrew Schulman: > > Achim, can you please add /bin/fish and /usr/bin/fish to /etc/shells in > > base-files? > > I seem to remember that this was discussed before. If you could perhaps > look up that discussion and fill me in what the conclusion was last time >

Re: add fish to /etc/shells (base-files)

Am 10.05.2016 um 20:19 schrieb Andrew Schulman: Achim, can you please add /bin/fish and /usr/bin/fish to /etc/shells in base-files? I seem to remember that this was discussed before. If you could perhaps look up that discussion and fill me in what the conclusion was last time around? --

Re: Lingua::Translit

Am 11.05.2016 um 14:27 schrieb Ken Brown: The next version of Biber will have a dependency on Lingua::Translit. Can you add that to the distro when you get a chance? I'll have a look at that. Not this week, though. -- Achim. (on the road :-)

pcre2?

fish 2.3 is currently bundling and building its own copy of libpcre2. There's an issue[1] open to unbundle it and use distributions' own versions, but libpcre2 hasn't been packaged for Cygwin yet. Yaakov, are you interested in packaging and maintaining pcre2? It builds fine OOTB for me, and it

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 05/10/2016 04:11 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > Package Maintainers, > > cygport 0.22.0 is on its way to the mirrors. With this release, and > thanks to Jon Turney's continuing work on calm (the replacement for > upset which generates setup.ini), packages marked ARCH=noarch will be > uploaded

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 11/05/16 07:17, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 00:07, Marco Atzeri wrote: So at this stage not the documentation subpackages, but only if all subpackages are in this category. correct ? At this time we are only considering those where all subpackages are noarch, i.e. ARCH=noarch is

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] clamav 0.99.1-1

On May 11, 2016, at 10:10 AM, Mike Bonnet wrote: > > On 5/11/16 8:18 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote: >> >>> Any chance we could get a new 64-bit build? >> >> We'd need to find the real cause of this before it would be of any help. >> I'd start with

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] clamav 0.99.1-1

On 5/11/16 8:18 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote: I'm seeing segfaults with this version when recursively scanning large directories. Running Cygwin x86_64 on Windows Server 2012. But not with 0.99? Have you been able to reproduce this on any other systems?

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 01:11, Thomas Wolff wrote: I wonder why this list or this action does not include all the source packages, which might even save more disk space than all the others together. Possibly, but at this time there is not support for separate parts of packages in different directories.

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 03:15, Andrew Schulman wrote: atool discus stow Moved to noarch. -- Yaakov

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] clamav 0.99.1-1

On 2016-05-11 09:35, Mike Bonnet wrote: I'm seeing segfaults with this version when recursively scanning large directories. Running Cygwin x86_64 on Windows Server 2012. But not with 0.99? Have you been able to reproduce this on any other systems? In the past When? this happened when

Re: [ANNOUNCEMENT] clamav 0.99.1-1

On 3/30/16 10:08 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: The following packages have been uploaded to the Cygwin distribution: * clamav-0.99.1-1 * clamav-doc-0.99.1-1 * libclamav7-0.99.1-1 * libclamav-devel-0.99.1-1 * clamav-db-main-57-1 * clamav-db-daily-21477.253-1 Clam AntiVirus is a GPL anti-virus

Lingua::Translit

Achim, The next version of Biber will have a dependency on Lingua::Translit. Can you add that to the distro when you get a chance? Thanks. Ken

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

Thanks for the headsup. > Once you have upgraded to cygport 0.22.0, maintainers MUST email a list > of their package(s) which qualify as noarch AND are already marked > ARCH=noarch or will be with the next release. atool discus stow

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

On 2016-05-11 00:07, Marco Atzeri wrote: So at this stage not the documentation subpackages, but only if all subpackages are in this category. correct ? At this time we are only considering those where all subpackages are noarch, i.e. ARCH=noarch is (or will be) defined. Not so sure if

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] ARCH=noarch uploads with cygport 0.22.0

Am 11.05.2016 um 00:11 schrieb Yaakov Selkowitz: Package Maintainers, cygport 0.22.0 is on its way to the mirrors. With this release, and thanks to Jon Turney's continuing work on calm (the replacement for upset which generates setup.ini), packages marked ARCH=noarch will be uploaded once