Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 16 Oct 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:11, Max Bowsher wrote:
David A. Cobb wrote:
Would it be a big deal to have the various setup scripts send their
output to, say, /var/log/setup/SCRIPTNAME.log?
Probably not, but
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, David A. Cobb wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 16 Oct 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:11, Max Bowsher wrote:
David A. Cobb wrote:
Would it be a big deal to have the various setup scripts send their
output to, say,
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 16 Oct 2002, David A. Cobb wrote:
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On 16 Oct 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:11, Max Bowsher wrote:
David A. Cobb wrote:
Would it be a big deal to have the various setup
I recently needed to do a total re-install of cygwin [ totalled one
partition ]. Took forever to get through the download stage because I
kept getting some network problems, but it finally got to the post-install.
During the post-install I observed several failures of the usual
fork-resource
David A. Cobb wrote:
Would it be a big deal to have the various setup scripts send their
output to, say, /var/log/setup/SCRIPTNAME.log?
Probably not, but someone has to actually do it.
Perhaps we should have a setup.exe web-based todo list? Like the current one
for the DLL?
(I know there is a
On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 09:33:02AM +1000, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:11, Max Bowsher wrote:
David A. Cobb wrote:
Would it be a big deal to have the various setup scripts send their
output to, say, /var/log/setup/SCRIPTNAME.log?
Probably not, but someone has to actually
On 16 Oct 2002, Robert Collins wrote:
On Wed, 2002-10-16 at 09:11, Max Bowsher wrote:
David A. Cobb wrote:
Would it be a big deal to have the various setup scripts send their
output to, say, /var/log/setup/SCRIPTNAME.log?
Probably not, but someone has to actually do it.
It's been
7 matches
Mail list logo
