On Wed, 16 Jul 2003, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released. No problems yet.
Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I used all the latest
[test] libs, bash, etc at work all day today, rebuilt gcc from cvs,
I can build and test gcc HEAD with 1.5.0 and latest (well yesterday's latest)
test packages. The testsuite results are similar to 1.3, but I haven't
checked the output line by line.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports:
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released. No problems yet.
Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I used all the latest
[test] libs, bash, etc at work all day today, rebuilt gcc from cvs,
re-autox-ed source trees,
-Original Message-
From: Rolf Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thu, July 17, 2003 12:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Anyone trying 1.5.0 for anything other than managed mode?
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
The exception: The - and + keys on the keypad are giving me *two* -'s or
+'s at the bash prompt.
Alternate data point to Danilo's: I have 1.5.0 (and bash 2.05b-10) on a
WinXP Pro SP1 Dell laptop, and don't have this problem, with or without
CYGWIN=tty.
--
Shankar.
From: Danilo Turina [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released. No problems yet.
Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I
used all the latest
[test] libs, bash, etc at work all
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released. No problems yet.
Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I used all the latest
[test] libs, bash, etc at work all day today, rebuilt gcc from cvs,
re-autox-ed source trees,
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released. No problems yet. (in fact, I notice the speed improvement
over 1.3.22 -- you know, that sparse file thing).
Christopher Faylor wrote:
Can I take the silence on bug reports for anything other than managed
mode as a
I've been using 1.5.0 for my large build environment since it was
released. No problems yet.
Same story here, with one exception, discussed later. I used all the latest
[test] libs, bash, etc at work all day today, rebuilt gcc from cvs,
re-autox-ed source trees, everything works.
The
9 matches
Mail list logo
