On Dec 21 15:25, Linda Walsh wrote:
I seem to remember that the cygwin ACL's were based on NFS acls not
the POSIX ACL's.
No, they are POSIX ACLs with Solaris API.
Corinna
--
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
On 12/21/2014 06:25 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
I seem to remember that the cygwin ACL's were based on NFS acls not
the POSIX ACL's.
I can't speak to the specific issues you're raising or shed any light
on whether they are actually issues with Cygwin. As far as the
On 12/21/2014 06:25 PM, Linda Walsh wrote:
I seem to remember that the cygwin ACL's were based on NFS acls not
the POSIX ACL's. From this snippet I read on the Samba list,
it seems there are some very difficult [nightmarish] cases
where NFS causes CIFS compatibility problems. Is this only
I seem to remember that the cygwin ACL's were based on NFS acls not
the POSIX ACL's. From this snippet I read on the Samba list,
it seems there are some very difficult [nightmarish] cases
where NFS causes CIFS compatibility problems. Is this only
NFSv4 (does cygwin model v4 or v3?) that had
4 matches
Mail list logo
