Larry Hall (Cygwin) sent the following at Wednesday, February 01, 2012 11:49 PM
If you're not seeing a problem now, you don't need to run rebaseall.
If you choose to run it anyway, so be it. Given the almost constant
state of flux of DLLs on Windows machines, running it isn't any kind of
perpetual
marco atzeri sent the following at Monday, January 30, 2012 3:20 PM
On 1/26/2012 1:07 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
marco atzeri sent the following at Friday, January 20, 2012 3:49 AM
my 2c$ : As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and we are always
suggesting it to anyone
On 2/1/2012 9:43 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
marco atzeri sent the following at Monday, January 30, 2012 3:20 PM
On 1/26/2012 1:07 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
marco atzeri sent the following at Friday, January 20, 2012 3:49 AM
my 2c$ : As rebaseall is almost
On 1/26/2012 1:07 PM, Buchbinder, Barry (NIH/NIAID) [E] wrote:
marco atzeri sent the following at Friday, January 20, 2012 3:49 AM
my 2c$ : As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and we are always
suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
My box was upgraded from XP Pro to W7 a couple of
On Jan 25 01:28, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:03:05PM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
This problem is killing me. I'm currently looking msysgit + GnuWin32
because I just can't take the crashes of bash.exe and git.exe anymore.
In my
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:03:05PM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
This problem is killing me. I'm currently looking msysgit + GnuWin32
because I just can't take the crashes of bash.exe and git.exe anymore.
In my testing, so far, I've
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:03:05PM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
This problem is killing me. I'm currently looking msysgit + GnuWin32
because I just can't take the crashes of bash.exe and git.exe anymore.
In my testing, so far, I've
I now have several hours of intense use, and I haven't seen one
crash. Kudos to all that have contributed to this fix.
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info:
On 1/25/2012 1:58 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:03:05PM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
This problem is killing me. I'm currently looking msysgit + GnuWin32
because I just can't take the crashes of bash.exe and git.exe
Robert Miles wrote:
NOTE: I run with CYGWIN=nodosfilewarning proc_retry:1 because I run
a lot of non-cygwin software from shell scripts, and during testing,
that can take 10's of minutes, I can't afford to have those programs
restarted if they crash on exit. Before setting proc_retry:1,
How should the batch file determine the Cygwin installation location?
Just assuming C:\cygwin will not work for everyone.
The batch file could be generated in a postinstall script via sed or gawk.
What's the supported way in a postinstall script to find the Cygwin
installation directory?
Andrew Schulman skrev 2012-01-24 13:04:
How should the batch file determine the Cygwin installation location?
Just assuming C:\cygwin will not work for everyone.
The batch file could be generated in a postinstall script via sed or gawk.
What's the supported way in a postinstall script to
What's the supported way in a postinstall script to find the Cygwin
installation directory? I thought of 'cat
/proc/registry/HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Cygwin/something-or-other', but
it seems that there can be multiple installation locations stored there.
Will cygpath -m / do?
Uh...
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:12:35AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
What's the supported way in a postinstall script to find the Cygwin
installation directory? I thought of 'cat
/proc/registry/HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Cygwin/something-or-other', but
it seems that there can be multiple
Christopher Faylor skrev 2012-01-24 17:01:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:12:35AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
What's the supported way in a postinstall script to find the Cygwin
installation directory? I thought of 'cat
/proc/registry/HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Cygwin/something-or-other', but
On Jan 24 11:01, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:12:35AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
What's the supported way in a postinstall script to find the Cygwin
installation directory? I thought of 'cat
/proc/registry/HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Cygwin/something-or-other',
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:12:35AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
What's the supported way in a postinstall script to find the Cygwin
installation directory? I thought of 'cat
/proc/registry/HKEY_CURRENT_USER/Software/Cygwin/something-or-other', but
it seems that there can be multiple
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:19:43PM +0100, Peter Rosin wrote:
Christopher Faylor skrev 2012-01-24 17:01:
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 07:12:35AM -0500, Andrew Schulman wrote:
What's the supported way in a postinstall script to find the Cygwin
installation directory? I thought of 'cat
I wish I could report success like you.
Using 20120123, just printing my prompt, which runs git rev-parse
and git branch, I saw this (pd is an alias for pushd):
thor$ pd
/home/scm/acl90b.64 /home/scm/acl90b.64/src/cl/src
7 [main] bash 1732 c:\cygwin\bin\bash.exe: *** fatal error - couldn't
On 1/24/2012 6:00 PM, Kevin Layer wrote:
I wish I could report success like you.
Using 20120123, just printing my prompt, which runs git rev-parse
and git branch, I saw this (pd is an alias for pushd):
thor$ pd
/home/scm/acl90b.64 /home/scm/acl90b.64/src/cl/src
7 [main] bash 1732
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
This problem is killing me. I'm currently looking msysgit + GnuWin32
because I just can't take the crashes of bash.exe and git.exe anymore.
In my testing, so far, I've never seen msysgit or the bash that comes
with it crash. Why is it that cygwin has this
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 10:03:05PM -0800, Kevin Layer wrote:
Larry Hall (Cygwin) wrote:
This problem is killing me. I'm currently looking msysgit + GnuWin32
because I just can't take the crashes of bash.exe and git.exe anymore.
In my testing, so far, I've never seen msysgit or the bash
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:23:15PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[Moved to cygwin-apps for discussion]
On Jan 20 09:49, marco atzeri wrote:
As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and
we are always suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
I think a simple batch file in the / (called
On Jan 23 10:51, Jason Tishler wrote:
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:23:15PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[Moved to cygwin-apps for discussion]
On Jan 20 09:49, marco atzeri wrote:
As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and
we are always suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
Hi,
On 22/01/12 16:53, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:47:19AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 01:07:45PM +1100, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
Hi,
On 22/01/12 05:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback. It looks like if we can fix
Hi,
On 22/01/12 21:33, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
You are right about the stack trace, as it is from the first known
bad snapshot, 2011-12-17. And it was wrong of me to use that
snapshot, as the Bad address errors don't occur with the latest
snapshot, 2012-01-11.
It seems I spoke too soon. The
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:30:23AM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
On 1/22/2012 6:53 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:47:19AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 01:07:45PM +1100, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
Hi,
On 22/01/12 05:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On 1/22/2012 5:57 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:30:23AM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
Cgf
I saw the problem in erratic way also before running updatedb.
But it is very evanescent and usually linked on how find is called.
Could you try the latest snapshot?
cgf
le
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:11:18PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
On 1/22/2012 5:57 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:30:23AM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
I saw the problem in erratic way also before running updatedb.
But it is very evanescent and usually linked on how find is
Hi,
On 23/01/12 06:33, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:11:18PM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
On 1/22/2012 5:57 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 08:30:23AM +0100, marco atzeri wrote:
I saw the problem in erratic way also before running updatedb.
But it
On 1/19/2012 2:06 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 19 January 2012 14:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please reports variations
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 08:45:58AM -0800, Hans Horn wrote:
On 1/19/2012 2:06 PM, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 19 January 2012 14:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
Hi,
On 22/01/12 05:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback. It looks like if we can fix Yaakov's
problem
we may be ready to ship.
I have one more problem to report. I tracked this problem as being
introduced in the 2011-12-17 00:14:25 UTC snapshot, including the
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 01:07:45PM +1100, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
Hi,
On 22/01/12 05:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback. It looks like if we can fix Yaakov's
problem
we may be ready to ship.
I have one more problem to report. I tracked this problem as being
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 12:47:19AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 01:07:45PM +1100, Shaddy Baddah wrote:
Hi,
On 22/01/12 05:18, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Thanks for the positive feedback. It looks like if we can fix Yaakov's
problem
we may be ready to ship.
I have
[Moved to cygwin-apps for discussion]
On Jan 20 09:49, marco atzeri wrote:
As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and
we are always suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
I think a simple batch file in the / (called rebase.bat ?)
similar to the cygwin.bat
with something like
On 1/20/2012 2:23 PM, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[Moved to cygwin-apps for discussion]
On Jan 20 09:49, marco atzeri wrote:
As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and
we are always suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
I think a simple batch file in the / (called rebase.bat ?)
similar to
On 20 January 2012 08:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[Moved to cygwin-apps for discussion]
On Jan 20 09:49, marco atzeri wrote:
As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and
we are always suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
I think a simple batch file in the / (called rebase.bat ?)
On Jan 20 09:06, Chris Sutcliffe wrote:
On 20 January 2012 08:23, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
[Moved to cygwin-apps for discussion]
On Jan 20 09:49, marco atzeri wrote:
As rebaseall is almost mandatory on W7/64 and
we are always suggesting it to anyone with fork problem,
I think a simple
On 1/19/2012 8:52 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please reports variations from 1.7.9, including Hey! It's a lot faster
than
On Jan 19 21:42, A.R. Burgers wrote:
Op 19-1-2012 20:52, Christopher Faylor schreef:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please reports variations from
On Jan 20 01:42, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:52 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 02:06:32PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
On Jan 20 01:42, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:52 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent
Corinna Vinschen skrev 2012-01-20 14:06:
On Jan 20 01:42, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote:
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:52 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please reports variations from 1.7.9, including Hey! It's a lot faster
than 1.7.9! as well as the usual bug reports.
When
Op 19-1-2012 20:52, Christopher Faylor schreef:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please reports variations from 1.7.9, including Hey! It's a lot faster
than
On 19 January 2012 14:52, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please reports variations from 1.7.9, including Hey! It's a lot faster
On Thu, 2012-01-19 at 14:52 -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Corinna and I think that we're coming close to achieving stability for
a new release so we'd like you to try the most recent snapshot at:
http://cygwin.com/snapshots/
Please reports variations from 1.7.9, including Hey! It's a
48 matches
Mail list logo
