RE: whois package

2002-01-07 Thread Mark Bradshaw
Fixed. I'm not sure how the cygwin readme in the source package is supposed to be named/located. I just dropped it in there. Mark -Original Message- From: Gerrit P. Haase [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, January 04, 2002 8:16 PM To: Christopher Faylor Subject: Re: whois

Re: setup.exe copyright?

2002-01-07 Thread Warren Young
Christopher Faylor wrote: I just perused the setup.exe source for the first time in a long time and found a few copyrights from a few different people. I understood that when you signed the consent forms, you signed over your copyrights to Red Hat, for simplicity's sake. Therefore, the

Re: setup.exe copyright?

2002-01-07 Thread Warren Young
Robert Collins wrote: There is a step beyond... rather than a copyright assignment, we can require mugshots :]. HAVE YOU SEEN THIS CODER: Wanted for improper curly-brace placement on 5 systems -- = ICBM Address: 36.8274040 N, 108.0204086 W, alt. 1714m

Re: Success report: Setup.exe on Windows 2000.

2002-01-07 Thread Robert Collins
=== - Original Message - From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wasn't expecting you to provide this. All that I wanted was clickable categories. I'll take care of providing an uber-category. FWIW, I was going to call it Full rather than All since you pointed out that there

Re: setup.exe copyright?

2002-01-07 Thread Robert Collins
Setup.exe doesn't not require copyright assignment - it's not part of cygwin. Rob === - Original Message - From: Warren Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 5:18 AM Subject: Re: setup.exe copyright? Christopher Faylor wrote: I just perused

Re: Success report: Setup.exe on Windows 2000.

2002-01-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:07:10AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] I wasn't expecting you to provide this. All that I wanted was clickable categories. I'll take care of providing an uber-category. FWIW, I was going to call it Full rather than All since

Re: Success report: Setup.exe on Windows 2000.

2002-01-07 Thread Robert Collins
- Original Message - From: Christopher Faylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] I don't understand. Why is there an All there at all? The only thing that I've asked for, and have been asking for, is clickable categories. I wasn't asking for special All logic. The All is a freebie that took me all

Re: Success report: Setup.exe on Windows 2000.

2002-01-07 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Tue, Jan 08, 2002 at 09:35:36AM +1100, Robert Collins wrote: The second issue is that (IMO) for users, in a hierarchical environment, finding a category Full, is less intuitive than a hierarchical container that encompasses everything. I've the same objection about both things, so I chose this