On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote:
I update doxygen-package.
Uploaded.
On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 16:27, Gary R. Van Sickle wrote:
make 'CFLAGS=-O0 -g' 'CXXFLAGS=-O0 -g'
Yep. And configuring with that should work too. The Makefile sets
warning flags, not optimisation levels or debug. It does that via
AM_CFLAGS.
Cheers,
Rob
--
---
GPG key available at:
Hi Max,
just a final thought on the 'keep' sutff (maybe you've gone ahead and coded
it already, so then you forget about this). This is on the question to put
'keep' in the spin control or a radio button. we had
kris so maybe it makes more sense to add a 'keep' to this sequence, than
kris to add
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Kris Thielemans wrote:
KT just a final thought on the 'keep' sutff (maybe you've gone ahead and coded
KT it already, so then you forget about this). This is on the question to put
KT 'keep' in the spin control or a radio button. we had
I coded it and sent a patch to this list
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 09:58:29AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Ryunosuke Satoh wrote:
I update doxygen-package.
Uploaded.
Correct me if I'm wrong but was that two packages with the same name
uploaded to sources.redhat.com? I don't think that's correct, if so.
We shouldn't
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but was that two packages with the same name
uploaded to sources.redhat.com? I don't think that's correct, if so.
We shouldn't be offering the same package with different contents to
users even if the changes to the
On Mon, Dec 02, 2002 at 06:52:10PM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Mon, 2 Dec 2002, Christopher Faylor wrote:
Correct me if I'm wrong but was that two packages with the same name
uploaded to sources.redhat.com? I don't think that's correct, if so.
We shouldn't be offering the same package with
When I try to run apache command with ssl configure in the httpd.conf file, I
received the following error:
[Mon Dec 2 16:26:26 2002] [notice] Apache/1.3.24
I've discovered that in some cases I'm not getting the response that I
expect from the HTTP request that setup.exe issues. I believe my particular
case is probably a misconfiguration of the Apache server that hosts my
website, but in any case I think it might make the setup.exe user experience
a
