Pending packages status

2003-02-27 Thread Pavel Tsekov
1. grace date : 25 Nov 2002 version: 5.1.10-1 status : not reviewed notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html votes : 2 (Lapo and Robert) url: http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1.tar.bz2 http://www.scytek.de/cygwin/grace-5.1.10-1-src.tar.bz2

Re: lilypond-1.6.8-2

2003-02-27 Thread Pavel Tsekov
On 27 Feb 2003, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: This is documentation build fix; most of the documentation did not build and was missing from -1. I'm a bit embarrassed to have overlooked this. Uploaded. I've removed 1.6.8-1.

RE: Can't install CygWin using setup - says completed sucessfully but no bin or var directories

2003-02-27 Thread Tom Gilbert
So I think the problem arose because I had a copy of OpenSSH installed, which includes cygwin (apparently). So, there was already a copy of the cygwin dll on my system. Note that the CygWin setup MADE NO ATTEMPT TO DETECT THIS!!! The only way I found out what was up was to install the PostgreSQL

Re: Pending packages status (fwd)

2003-02-27 Thread Pavel Tsekov
It seems like you've replied only to me and not the list. I'm forwarding you message there. -- Forwarded message -- Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2003 11:42:26 +0100 From: Volker Quetschke [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Pending packages status Hi! 3.

Re: Can't install cygwin using setup - says completed sucessfully but no bin or var directories

2003-02-27 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 11:00:00AM -, Tom Gilbert wrote: So I think the problem arose because I had a copy of OpenSSH installed, which includes cygwin (apparently). So, there was already a copy of the cygwin dll on my system. Note that the CygWin setup MADE NO ATTEMPT TO DETECT THIS!!! Calm

RE: Can't install cygwin using setup - says completed sucessfully but no bin or var directories

2003-02-27 Thread Tom Gilbert
Hi Christopher, Thanks very much for replying. Note that the CygWin setup MADE NO ATTEMPT TO DETECT THIS!!! Calm down. Actually, Cygwin setup did detect this. The OpenSSH installation apparently screwed up your mount table. Sorry, I forgot that CAPS implies shouting. I meant only

Re: Pending packages status

2003-02-27 Thread Igor Pechtchanski
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: [snip] 10. pdksh ... votes : 2 (Christopher and Corinna) [snip] Hi, I don't know if my vote counts, since I'm not actually a maintainer, but I'd like to see this as an official package. Igor --

RE: Pending packages status

2003-02-27 Thread Robb, Sam
2. nfs-server date : 09 Dec 2002 version: 2.2.47-1 status : reviewed; there are several pending issues (more info can be found in the nfs related threads starting after Feb 11, 2003) Just wanted to let folks know that I haven't forgotten about this, but that other

Re: Request #2 to add a new package: ccdoc

2003-02-27 Thread Pavel Tsekov
I've made a brief review of the packaging, but not the functionality. Here is a list of problems that need to be fixed: 1) The source package includes files/dirs left by tools like autoconf and configure. These need to be removed. I see there is no 'distclean' stage in you Makefile, so I guess

Re: Can't install CygWin using setup - says completed sucessfully but no bin or var directories

2003-02-27 Thread Thorsten Kampe
* Tom Gilbert (03-02-27 11:00 +0100) So I think the problem arose because I had a copy of OpenSSH installed, which includes cygwin (apparently). So, there was already a copy of the cygwin dll on my system. Note that the CygWin setup MADE NO ATTEMPT TO DETECT THIS!!! Lazy, silly Cygwin

Re: Pending packages status

2003-02-27 Thread Hack Kampbjorn
Igor Pechtchanski wrote: On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote: [snip] 10. pdksh ... votes : 2 (Christopher and Corinna) [snip] Hi, I don't know if my vote counts, since I'm not actually a maintainer, but I'd like to see this as an official package. Igor +1 In case it needs more

tetex versioning problem [Re: Updated: lilypond-1.6.8-2 for Cygwin]

2003-02-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
I've been alerted by Rick Rankin about the fact that Cygwin's setup.ini lists the new tetex-2.0.1-1 as [prev] and the old tetex-20020911-1 as [curr]. My personal setup.ini script got it 'right' (in this case) when I tested it (ages ago), so I didn't think of it lateron. Would adding a [curr]

Re: tetex versioning problem [Re: Updated: lilypond-1.6.8-2 for Cygwin]

2003-02-27 Thread Max Bowsher
Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: I've been alerted by Rick Rankin about the fact that Cygwin's setup.ini lists the new tetex-2.0.1-1 as [prev] and the old tetex-20020911-1 as [curr]. My personal setup.ini script got it 'right' (in this case) when I tested it (ages ago), so I didn't think of it

Re: tetex versioning problem [Re: Updated: lilypond-1.6.8-2 for Cygwin]

2003-02-27 Thread Jan Nieuwenhuizen
Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://cygwin.com/setup.html#setup.hint shows the correct syntax. Thanks. Can someone please include curr: 2.0.1-1 prev: 20020911-1 in tetex's hint files: tetex/tetex-devel/setup.hint tetex/libkpathsea3/setup.hint

Re: tetex versioning problem [Re: Updated: lilypond-1.6.8-2 for cygwin]

2003-02-27 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 10:20:19PM +0100, Jan Nieuwenhuizen wrote: Max Bowsher [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: http://cygwin.com/setup.html#setup.hint shows the correct syntax. Thanks. Can someone please include curr: 2.0.1-1 prev: 20020911-1 Done. cgf

A new version of setup very soon?

2003-02-27 Thread Christopher Faylor
I would really appreciate it if we could release a new version of setup.exe with (at least) Pierre Humblet's ntsec changes soon. I think it is becoming very clear that Pierre's ntsec changes are required if we want sane behavior for executables after installation. Having Gary's resize option

setup.exe mod_php4

2003-02-27 Thread Lionel Zhou
hi list: There are two problems in the cygwin distribution associated with apache and mod_php4. #1, setup.exe doesn't install mod_php4, even so setup.exe can download this module from internet to local hard drive. #2 after manually unpack the mod_php4 package and put every pieces of the

Re: Request #2 to add a new package: ccdoc

2003-02-27 Thread Joe Linoff
Hi Pavel: Thanks for taking the time to detail the issues. It really helps novices like me: Pavel Tsekov wrote: I've made a brief review of the packaging, but not the functionality. Here is a list of problems that need to be fixed: 1) The source package includes files/dirs left by tools