-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:20:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Gallew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LPRng issues
I tried to reply to the list a couple of times, but qmail is rejecting my
messages. Therefore I'm replying (sorta) directly to you.
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:20:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Gallew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LPRng issues
I tried to reply to the list a couple of times, but qmail is rejecting my
From: Brian Gallew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
THe autom4te cache was left there because it is in the original source
tarball that I downloaded from ftp.lprng.com. I didn't have any errors
when I ran the configure script myself (strange that you should have an
error) which is why I didn't provide a
On Wed, Mar 12, 2003 at 11:12:41AM +0100, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 22:20:52 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Gallew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: LPRng issues
I tried to reply to
Pavel Tsekov wrote:
From: Brian Gallew [EMAIL PROTECTED]
no patches whatsoever. I didn't regenerate configure or *.in. The
only difference between my source tarball and the original one is
that this one is pre-configured (in case someone just wants to type
make). If you'd prefer, I can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
| 1. grace
|
| date : 25 Nov 2002
| version: 5.1.12-1
| status : updated package available for review
| notes : http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2002-11/msg00322.html
| reviews: http://www.cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00254.html
|
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Robert Collins wrote:
On Tue, [EMAIL PROTECTED]:37, Max Bowsher wrote:
Ok, well I'm going to practice delegation here: Max - when you look
at zlib, can you ensure that the timestamps on zlib's autotool
files are correctly ordered?
Delegation
On Mon, 2003-03-10 at 09:09, Pavel Tsekov wrote:
Changelog entry:
2003-03-09 Pavel Tsekov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
* install.cc (do_install_thread): Use IDS_SKIP_PACKAGE
instead of IDS_CORRUPT_PACKAGE when asking the user to take
action if the hash verification check fails
And another, to fix my mistake in the last one - Sorry Igor!
Patches queued for review:
~~
* Igor's postinstall ordering patch
Latest patch here:
http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin-apps/2003-03/msg00293.html
Just waiting for me (Max) to do it:
~~~
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
Max,
Again, only relevant parts quoted...
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
Time for another one of these!
Patches queued for review:
~~
[snip]
* Igor's postinstall logging
Many threads. Latest one starts here:
On 13 Mar 2003, Robert Collins wrote:
Applied, thank you.
I made a small tweak to the code there at the same time, to eliminate
do_skip. It's good practice to use a query method where possible, as
this makes the semantic clearer to a casual reader (modulo the clarity
of the method names).
Igor Pechtchanski wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Max Bowsher wrote:
I've remembered the complication I mentioned: cvs checkout recreates
timestamps from the repository, but cvs update does not. However,
this won't bother us, since we hardly ever update the
zlib/bz2lib/rsync subdirs.
I'll
12 matches
Mail list logo