Re: [ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-10 Thread Tacvek
Corinna Vinschen wrote: Charles said it all. Thanks for the offer, but MingW packages really don't belong in the Cygwin distro, but in the MingW distro. I'm sorry, but on this one I must respectfully dissagree. While Cygwin is clearly a disto, i find mingw to be more a compilation target

Re: [ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-10 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Fri, Feb 10, 2006 at 11:38:02AM -0500, Tacvek wrote: Corinna Vinschen wrote: Charles said it all. Thanks for the offer, but MingW packages really don't belong in the Cygwin distro, but in the MingW distro. I'm sorry, but on this one I must respectfully dissagree. While Cygwin is clearly a

Re: [ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-10 Thread Brian Dessent
Christopher Faylor wrote: I don't know that and a search of the debian site for the word mingw does not unearth any hits. Debian's package search page is not always that great. But they do provide three packages (mingw32, mingw32-binutils, and mingw32-runtime) which together form a

Re: [ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 8 01:51, Charles Wilson wrote: Peter Quiring wrote: I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng, Sorry, but I have to veto these (but see good news, below) and openssl. I'll leave Corinna to comment on this one.

Re: [ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-08 Thread Charles Wilson
Charles Wilson wrote: Peter Quiring wrote: I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng, Sorry, but I have to veto these (but see good news, below) Just to clarify: veto is too strong a word for me to use, since my name isn't

Re: [ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-08 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Feb 8 09:56, Charles Wilson wrote: Charles Wilson wrote: Peter Quiring wrote: I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng, Sorry, but I have to veto these (but see good news, below) Just to clarify: veto is too strong a

Re: [ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-08 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 04:11:05PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Feb 8 09:56, Charles Wilson wrote: Charles Wilson wrote: Peter Quiring wrote: I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng, Sorry, but I have to veto these

Re: [ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-08 Thread Peter Quiring
Ok, thanks for all the info, I didn't know that mingw.sf.net was distributing packages as I can now see. I will try there. Thanks.

[ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-07 Thread Peter Quiring
Okay, I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng, and openssl. The conventions I used are slightly different from cygwin standards but were neccessary to compile under the mingw system. The source includes two scripts, one to

Re: [ITP] mingw-libjpeg, mingw-libpng, mingw-openssl

2006-02-07 Thread Charles Wilson
Peter Quiring wrote: I've created some packages for Cygwin under the mingw category. They are mingw versions of libjpeg, libpng, Sorry, but I have to veto these (but see good news, below) and openssl. I'll leave Corinna to comment on this one. The conventions I used are slightly