Re: [PATCH] setup: port to 64-bit, part 2

2013-03-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 17 16:27, Yaakov wrote: On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:58:10 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: Btw, was it announced that Yaakov was working on a complete 64-bit release? I knew that this was a possibility but was it actually announced that there would be a release area in cygwin's ftp area

Re: [PATCH] setup: port to 64-bit, part 2

2013-03-18 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 17 12:43, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:35:46AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 17 02:27, Christopher Faylor wrote: If we're going to do that then I'd like the actual maintainers to start generating packages rather than random other people. Otherwise

Re: [PATCH] setup: port to 64-bit, part 2

2013-03-17 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 17 02:27, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 12:28:47AM -0500, Yaakov wrote: On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 07:08:01 +0100, marco atzeri wrote: how far we are from the 64bit setup release ? I miss the dependency check of cygport ;-) The setup code is ready to ship for 64bit;

Re: [PATCH] setup: port to 64-bit, part 2

2013-03-17 Thread Christopher Faylor
On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:35:46AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 17 02:27, Christopher Faylor wrote: If we're going to do that then I'd like the actual maintainers to start generating packages rather than random other people. Otherwise chaos will ensue. I didn't know Yaakov is a

Re: [PATCH] setup: port to 64-bit, part 2

2013-03-17 Thread marco atzeri
On 3/17/2013 5:43 PM, Christopher Faylor wrote: On Sun, Mar 17, 2013 at 10:35:46AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 17 02:27, Christopher Faylor wrote: If we're going to do that then I'd like the actual maintainers to start generating packages rather than random other people. Otherwise

Re: [PATCH] setup: port to 64-bit, part 2

2013-03-17 Thread Cygwin/X
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 13:58:10 -0400, Christopher Faylor wrote: Btw, was it announced that Yaakov was working on a complete 64-bit release? I knew that this was a possibility but was it actually announced that there would be a release area in cygwin's ftp area with packages (presumably) built

Re: [PATCH] setup: port to 64-bit, part 2

2013-03-16 Thread marco atzeri
On 3/14/2013 10:17 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: On Mar 13 15:06, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: This patch adjusts the EXE name, ini/bz2 name, registry calls, and default Cygwin root for x86_64. For now, setup64.exe is x86_64 only, but hopefully this should allow a future patch to allow switching

Re: [PATCH] setup: port to 64-bit, part 2

2013-03-16 Thread Cygwin/X
On Sat, 16 Mar 2013 07:08:01 +0100, marco atzeri wrote: how far we are from the 64bit setup release ? I miss the dependency check of cygport ;-) The setup code is ready to ship for 64bit; what's needed now is setting up a cronjob to generate the setup64.ini. Hopefully that can be done soon

Re: [PATCH] setup: port to 64-bit, part 2

2013-03-14 Thread Corinna Vinschen
On Mar 13 15:06, Yaakov (Cygwin/X) wrote: This patch adjusts the EXE name, ini/bz2 name, registry calls, and default Cygwin root for x86_64. For now, setup64.exe is x86_64 only, but hopefully this should allow a future patch to allow switching based on command-line option or additional