Hallo Earnie,
Am 2002-03-15 um 14:28 schriebst du:
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:48 PM
But if a cygwin
native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to package it.
IMO we
Hallo Christopher,
Am 2002-03-15 um 17:55 schriebst du:
Not that i'm against inclusion of upx to cygwin distro -- it's a
normal package like many others after all, but i really don't
understand why somebody would want to use such a program.
Excellent points. This is, IMO, an argument against
We should not precompress delivered binaries (besides setup.exe maybe?).
It will not reduce the size of the packages very much.
We could maybe include in the UPX file also two shell scripts: compress everything
and decompress everything, just to ease things to users.
--
Lapo 'Raist' Luchini
Hallo Lapo,
Am 2002-03-16 um 12:16 schriebst du:
We should not precompress delivered binaries (besides setup.exe maybe?).
It will not reduce the size of the packages very much.
We could maybe include in the UPX file also two shell scripts: compress everything
and decompress everything,
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
On Behalf Of Gerrit P. Haase
Sent: Saturday, 16 March 2002 2:38 PM
To: Lapo Luchini
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: RFP: UPX (Was Re: reducing binary distribution size with
UPX)
Hallo Lapo,
Am 2002-03-16 um
-Original Message-
From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:48 PM
But if a cygwin
native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to package it.
IMO we should have a fully self-hosted distribution. At the moment, with
the _single_
Robert Collins wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Lapo Luchini [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 15, 2002 11:48 PM
But if a cygwin
native version is needed nonetheless I could volunteer to package it.
IMO we should have a fully self-hosted distribution. At the
-Original Message-
From: Earnie Boyd [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:28 AM
Does UPX come with an API library that you can just use in setup?
That's a nice idea, and on a related note I'm considering compressing
setup.exe with UPX once it's a
-Original Message-
From: egor duda [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2002 12:42 AM
To: Robert Collins
Not that i'm against inclusion of upx to cygwin distro --
it's a normal package like many others after all, but i
really don't understand why somebody
On Fri, 2002-03-15 at 08:42, egor duda wrote:
Hi!
Friday, 15 March, 2002 Robert Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
RC I vote for including UPX... and Lapo makes two. Do we need a third? And
RC are there any objections?
Does anybody ever tried to measure if upx impose any performance
10 matches
Mail list logo
