Re: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-26 Thread Thomas Wolff
I also have a problem receiving mail because nail does not accept a mailbox account name containing /. I have reported it to the author and he says he fixed it in the CVS (upstream). This means that reading a mailbox actually works with the cygwin version besides this issue? No, it

Re: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-25 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Harold L Hunt II wrote: Can I get two more +1 votes? +1 vote from me. I'll take Gerrit's testing as a good to go. I'll fix additional problems that crop up later. If you want to take a look at the changes I did recently to build it: http://194.95.224.180/cygwin/release/nail/nail.cygwin.diff Only

Re: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-25 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Ross Smith II wrote: Harold L Hunt II wrote: Can I get two more +1 votes? I never got nail 11.11 to work properly. The biggest issue is nail sees all command line options as email addresses: $ echo test | nail -s subject [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ smtp-server: 501 -s: recipient

Re: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-25 Thread Dr. Volker Zell
Harold L Hunt, writes: Can I get two more +1 votes? +1 Ciao Volker

Re: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-25 Thread mined
I never got nail 11.11 to work properly. The biggest issue is nail sees all command line options as email addresses: $ echo test | nail -s subject [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ smtp-server: 501 -s: recipient address must contain a domain . . . message not sent. Is no one

Re: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-25 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Thomas Wolff wrote: I never got nail 11.11 to work properly. The biggest issue is nail sees all command line options as email addresses: $ echo test | nail -s subject [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ smtp-server: 501 -s: recipient address must contain a domain . . . message not sent. Is no

Re: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-24 Thread Gerrit P. Haase
Gary R. Van Sickle wrote: Now how did that subject line get through my spam filter? ;-) Hehe, spammer don't use nail as MUA? User-Agent: nail 11.11 10/13/04 ;) Gerrit -- =^..^=

Re: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-24 Thread Harold L Hunt II
Can I get two more +1 votes? I'll take Gerrit's testing as a good to go. I'll fix additional problems that crop up later. Harold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello Harold, your nail works (if you can read this;) To test the direct SMTP mail with nail I have this in .mailrc in my home directory: set

Re: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-24 Thread Ross Smith II
Harold L Hunt II wrote: Can I get two more +1 votes? I never got nail 11.11 to work properly. The biggest issue is nail sees all command line options as email addresses: $ echo test | nail -s subject [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ smtp-server: 501 -s: recipient address must contain

Your nail works for me.

2004-10-23 Thread gp
Hello Harold, your nail works (if you can read this;) To test the direct SMTP mail with nail I have this in .mailrc in my home directory: set smtp=192.168.1.1 set asksub set askcc set askatend set record=/var/mail/sent set [EMAIL PROTECTED] set hostname=familiehaase.de Since the mail is

RE: Your nail works for me.

2004-10-23 Thread Gary R. Van Sickle
Now how did that subject line get through my spam filter? ;-) -- Gary R. Van Sickle Hello Harold, your nail works (if you can read this;) To test the direct SMTP mail with nail I have this in .mailrc in my home directory: set smtp=192.168.1.1 set asksub set askcc set askatend