Don't make the mistake of assuming that content control must be
total or absolute. The market for such technologies, unlike many pundits
who dismiss them in all variety, demands only that the content control be
effective in denying the pirate the ability to make a market, to contest
Reese wrote:
I see this as one implementation of peer review, note that the writeup was
tailored for articles submitted to a journal, there are other
implementations. For example, Prof. John Lott offered his study on Guns
and Crime to anyone who expressed an interest, whilst he was
David Honig wrote:
Hi, my name is Adrienne and in my advanced history class we are making up
laws and trying to get them passed.
People who sit around making up laws for fun need to be shot.
it says "history class" right up there. I guess the teacher's intention
was to give a live
Just made me think of some similar discussions here...
'Many feminists were dismayed, especially by the judge's decision to make
the woman's name public; one activist fumed that "the judge needs
shooting."'
Date: 7 Mar 2000 12:06:18 -
To: List Member [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mailing-List:
At 21:36 3/6/2000 -1000, Reese wrote:
But although Phill has been intentionally obtuse in this debate, most
likely for his own amusement, he also has the substantial advantage of
knowing what he's talking about on at least this narrow point. "Reese"
responded with open-source dogma straight
Thanks McCullah,
This response has nothing to do with what you are discussing- but the
pomposity and the way the guys take them
selves so serious is aboslutely insane.I have listened in to so many of
these arguments, that are sometimes mean
spitfeul,and sarcastic and without an iota of humor
Best Truth : Intelligence and Security in the Information Age
by Bruce D. Berkowitz, Allan E. Goodman Publication date: March 2000
Publisher: Yale Univ Pr
Binding:Hardcover
I came across a company called InterTrust that claims to have developed a
system whereby digital content can be downloaded to a user's PC, the user
be required to pay for 'rights' to use the content under certain 'rules'
set by the content provider and yet the user will somehow be prevented
from
At 09:54 AM 3/7/00 -0500, Fisher Mark wrote:
Matter of fact, what a remailer network that does payment mixes for
anonymity _is_ money laundering, pure and simple. The essence of money
laundering is concealing where a glop of money comes from, which is exactly
what the PMFA is doing.
Cash has
Full information at http://www.geek.net/ama
30 Second Overview:
The AMA has sent me a CD letter (received the certified copy in the mail
today) telling me I have to remove an animted GIF from my _private_ web
site. Now I have to decide whether I want to buckle under to them or
fight them on
There seems to be a widespread misconception that "peer review" refers
to a process in which the material to be reviewed is thrown open to
the public. In fact the term is more restrictive and means a review by
a small number of selected experts in the field. Here is a description
from
At 09:54 AM 3/7/00 -0500, Fisher Mark wrote:
Matter of fact, what a remailer network that does payment mixes for
anonymity _is_ money laundering, pure and simple. The essence of money
laundering is concealing where a glop of money comes from, which is exactly
what the PMFA is doing.
David Molnar writes:
If payment mixes come online and the only visible users are "money
launderers", then this common carrier argument will be difficult.
Unfortunately, it seems to me that the early adopters of payment mixes may
well be the "money launderers" -- it may take a while to
"Robert A. Hayden" wrote:
Full information at http://www.geek.net/ama
30 Second Overview:
The AMA has sent me a CD letter (received the certified copy in the mail
today) telling me I have to remove an animted GIF from my _private_ web
site. Now I have to decide whether I want to buckle
On Sun, 5 Mar 100 23:17:57 - STIGLIC Anton wrote:
Yes, but remember we started a discussion in this subject so as to
give a real life analogy of what happens on the Web. Businesses who
sale you stuff face to face are probably going to go for the sale
over getting information. But then,
VERISIGN AGREED to acquire Web domain-name registrar Network Solutions in
an all-stock transaction the companies valued at $21 billion.
FOR MORE INFORMATION, see:
http://interactive.wsj.com/articles/SB952433102500587435.htm
===
Mark Leighton Fisher
But if this can't done how can they be attracting millions in venture
capital, signing partnerships with media companies, etc., etc. Just look
at their website and the press releases. Is this a case of the 'knig
wearing no clothes'? Jeff
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Fisher Mark wrote:
I came across a
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Robert A. Hayden wrote:
Full information at http://www.geek.net/ama
30 Second Overview:
The AMA has sent me a CD letter (received the certified copy in the mail
today) telling me I have to remove an animted GIF from my _private_ web
site. Now I have to decide whether
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Michael Motyka wrote:
you? Or have you always been a mindless, obedient twit? Is that what
Harvard is accepting for admission these days? If so, we're doomed. I
sure as hell won't send my kids there.
Would you believe I was being sarcastic? or would that simply
On Mon, 06 Mar 2000 22:39:48 Reese wrote:
There seems to be a widespread misconception that "peer review" refers
to a process in which the material to be reviewed is thrown open to
the public. In fact the term is more restrictive and means a review by
a small number of selected experts in
-Original Message-
From: Tim May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 2:50 PM
To: Stefan Brands
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: About payee untraceability ...
At 10:59 AM -0800 3/7/00, Stefan Brands wrote:
...
Here you circumvent the major issue by not
By the way, to forestall Clarice unblinding the cash received from Dave and
thus knowing the identity of the cash Alice gets, here's one option:
Alice provides the appropriate keys in an envelope Clarice encrypted to
Dave, such that Dave encrypts the blinded cash he sends back to Clarice.
At 12:00 PM -0800 3/7/00, Stefan Brands wrote:
...
You are right in case the design would be *limiting* the functionality
of the system without there being a need. Here, though, we are choosing
from one of two different functionalities that cannot be achieved at
the same time. The market might
--- message 1
From: Tim May [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 07, 2000 4:03 PM
Subject: RE: About payee untraceability ...
...
Payer untraceable cash plus payer untraceable cash in the
other direction becomes mutually untraceable cash. How else
could it be?
...
---
At 12:04 PM 3/7/00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All this ranting about payer/payee privacy and anon e-cash and so on is
pointless bit generation by sedated minds. It can happen only in your head.
You're ripping off McNealy's "there is no privacy, so bend
over and enjoy it" shrugging...
At 12:51 PM 3/7/00 -0500, Michael Motyka wrote:
I found curfews to be an effective technique for reminding me that I was
under the supervision and control of the institution imposing the curfew.
Better yet, strict and highly public punishments for even relatively minor
curfew violations have
the same time. The market might just as well punish your decision of
building the remote extortion possibility into the design -- in fact,
Ah, these must be the reasons for the failure of that paper cash
experiment.
What ? It did not fail ? Paper cash is in use around the globe for
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Jim Burnes wrote:
Jim Choate wrote:
A century ago? You dipshit the Ottoman Empire fell apart in the late
1800's while the first Communist theories formed in the late 1800's and
the first communist state formed in 1917.
Actually the first formal Communist
On Mon, 6 Mar 2000, Sunder wrote:
Erm, it is the same thing if you happen to be the worker/serf. You are
owned and anything you have in your possession isn't yours. It doesn't
matter much whether it's the Lord or the Party that owns it. What does
matter is that you don't. :)
The flip
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Igor Chudov @ home wrote:
I am going to a vacation and I would like to have my s_u_b_s_cribers
TEMPORARILY s_u_b_s_cribed by another node. Please drop me a note and I
will send you a list of my s_u_b_s_cribers so that you would s_u_b_s_cribe them
at your place until I
dmolnar wrote:
On Tue, 7 Mar 2000, Michael Motyka wrote:
you? Or have you always been a mindless, obedient twit? Is that what
Harvard is accepting for admission these days? If so, we're doomed. I
sure as hell won't send my kids there.
Would you believe I was being sarcastic? or
A visitor from a subdomain of cis.fed.gov has shown up at the cypherpunks
photo archive (http://www.mccullagh.org) and seemed particularly interested
in folks including Tim. Other connections have come from BXA, White House,
etc. They connected by clicking on URLs I posted to this list.
I
Dear Louis,
Hi, we at Driveway thank you for being a great customer. In an effort
to provide you with the best possible experience, we would like to
find out how you use our service. Please help us by taking a moment
to answer a few questions. You have until Monday, March 13th to
respond
Probably one for fight-sense-or-ship, my lawyers told me that the
chappie who was after me could have got a UK court judgement
enforced in the US.
Ironically enough the judge that rulled on the only one of his cases
to reach court made in open court the exact same allegation alledged
to have
At 5:05 PM -0800 3/7/00, David Honig wrote:
At 12:51 PM 3/7/00 -0500, Michael Motyka wrote:
I found curfews to be an effective technique for reminding me that I was
under the supervision and control of the institution imposing the curfew.
Better yet, strict and highly public punishments for
http://www.mccullagh.org/image/otherphotos/terror.html
Oh I could probably flame on open source software quite as well
as a slashdot weenie. After all I did share a building with Stallman
himself once you know. He was quite keen on the idea of doing
particle physics experiments in orbit - lots of vaccum there, save
costs.
And actually, UK libel
"Phillip Hallam-Baker" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think you are probably refering to Ron's paper in FC'98. I presented an
alternative and somewhat radical architecture at RSA'99 which demonstrated
that it was practical to distribute revocation info in real time for a
population of 5 billion
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anyone have a comprehensive list of the IP's that
ad.doubleclick.net gets assigned to as it rambles along,
switching IP's?
I'd like to kill doubleclick at my firewall.
someone - I think on this list - posted the idea of just putting
doubleclick.net and
THANK YOU FOR JOINING RadioFreeCash.com
OUR MEMBERSHIP AGREEMENT WILL BE COMING AS A SEPARATE EMAIL
Here is your account information:
First Name: Ripley
Last Name: Stevens
Member Name (needed to sign in): RipleySt
Your email (needed to sign in): [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Password (needed to sign in):
40 matches
Mail list logo
