Tim May wrote:
About 90% of all spam and clueless "how do i make bombz?" crap would
be eliminated if messages to toad.com were not picked up by the real
nodes.
Considering that John Gilmore announced several years ago his wish
that traffic be migrated off of toad, I think this is the
Ah, Ryan, we hardly knew ye... Keep your head down when they start
shooting, boy...
Cheers,
RAH
--- begin forwarded text
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2000 21:39:57 -0500 (EST)
From: Chris Wysopal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: HavenCo opens datahaven in the Principality of Sealand
How can we verify that Sameer is in fact involved in this data crypt thing happening
off the coast of London?
Your message failed to be delivered.
The following error message was reported:
=
That appears to be an invalid fraud message.
I could not determine which list it is for and what
your subscribed address is.
From the Havenco AUP:
Unacceptable publications include, but are not limited to:
1. Material that is ruled unlawful in the jurisdiction of the
originating server (Such as child pornography, in the case of our
flagship Sealand datacenter)
Just a small nit, but does Sealand law grant common
---
This mail is never sent unsolicited. To unsubscribe reply
to this message to with remove in the subject line.
---
Put your business online, instantly. gTranz
A followup article on the legal aspects is here:
http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,36756,00.html
My favorite quote from an international law prof at Georgetown University:
"I suspect we could blow them out of the water, although I wouldn't
recommend that, and if they were in fact
