these days. However, he sees his contribution as critical, believing
that "encryption software architectural decisions must be made by
knowledgeable cryptographers, not software engineers." He has very
firm opinions, for example, about Gnu Privacy Guard (GnuPG), an open
source competitor to
On Fri, Oct 27, 2000 at 11:40:07PM -0400, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 7:45 PM -0700 on 10/27/00, Tim May wrote:
You didn't copy her (or the droids who read her mail for her) on your reply.
Actually, I did, but I accidently used the bcc field, in mis-copying same.
I think her real
On Tue, Jul 18, 2000 at 11:32:21AM -0400, Trei, Peter wrote:
The only factors which rein in this exploitation are speed and cost. A
determined, well-funded investigator could remount the platters
and attempt to read them using special tools, such as STM probes.
However, I'd be really
On Wed, Jul 12, 2000 at 09:12:00AM -0700, Anonymous wrote:
If someone has a better and simpler idea, I'd like to hear it.
I use a small perl script.
The script keeps a list of known senders. If a From line is contained
in the list, the message is delivered. Otherwise the script looks up
if
On Sat, Jun 10, 2000 at 09:21:00PM -0500, William H. Geiger III wrote:
Can't buy it they throw their vast resource at producing a competing
product and give it away for free claiming it is part of the OS (anyone
remember doublespace?).
FSF giving software away is good, and MS giving software
On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 02:35:09PM -0500, dmolnar wrote:
Was wondering if anyone else had seen this and wanted to comment?
I think it is interesting that the work of Andreas Pfitzmann and his
group is now becoming more similar to the ideas that have been
discussed on cypherpunks over the
