At 12:24 AM 06/06/2000 -0700, Tim May wrote:
toad should, however, bounce back some kind of pointer if you try to
subscribe and/or mail over it, since it's still listed as "the
cypherpunk node" at various places.
This is the fault of those "various places." Frankly, worrying about
what a 1993
At 12:02 PM +0200 6/5/00, Tom Vogt wrote:
Tim May wrote:
About 90% of all spam and clueless "how do i make bombz?" crap would
be eliminated if messages to toad.com were not picked up by the real
nodes.
Considering that John Gilmore announced several years ago his wish
that traffic be
Tim May wrote:
About 90% of all spam and clueless "how do i make bombz?" crap would
be eliminated if messages to toad.com were not picked up by the real
nodes.
Considering that John Gilmore announced several years ago his wish
that traffic be migrated off of toad, I think this is the
On Fri, Jun 02, 2000 at 09:00:24PM -0700, Tim May wrote:
About 90% of all spam and clueless "how do i make bombz?" crap would
be eliminated if messages to toad.com were not picked up by the real
nodes.
I've been filtering toad.com cpunks mail off to a seperate folder
for the last couple
At 11:46 AM -0400 6/3/00, Sunder wrote:
While I normally would agree with this, it's not that great an
idea. There are old materials out there that point to this address as the
canonical cypherpunks address. Whether they're articles or old web sites
or whatever, it would be bad to simply let
About 90% of all spam and clueless "how do i make bombz?" crap would
be eliminated if messages to toad.com were not picked up by the real
nodes.
Considering that John Gilmore announced several years ago his wish
that traffic be migrated off of toad, I think this is the right time
to no
