Re: New Encryption System for Music (nytimes)

2000-07-18 Thread Tom Vogt
Vin McLellan wrote: In the US, at least, no copyright held by a corporation has been given over to the public domain since WWI -- and, Tom's suggestion to the contrary, there were many of them in corporate hands even then;-) are there any sources for this? None I

Re: New Encryption System for Music (nytimes)

2000-07-17 Thread Tom Vogt
Vin McLellan wrote: anonymous' view is too drastic, but I guess that he's more close to home as far as copyright AS A BUSINESS is concerned. I don't remember any multinational corporations living entirely on (C) in, say, 1928. In the 1920s, all over the industrialized world,

Re: New Encryption System for Music (nytimes)

2000-07-17 Thread Vin McLellan
Tom Vogt wrote: anonymous' view is too drastic, but I guess that he's more close to home as far as copyright AS A BUSINESS is concerned. I don't remember any multinational corporations living entirely on (C) in, say, 1928. Vin McLellan replied: In the

RE: New Encryption System for Music (nytimes)

2000-07-09 Thread Vin McLellan
Secret Squirrel declared: Copyright is a short-lived aberration (60-70 years ?), and technology is finally dealing with it. Vin McLellan replied: U. Check out Section 8 of the US Constitution. 1787.

Re: New Encryption System for Music (nytimes)

2000-07-07 Thread Tom Vogt
Vin McLellan wrote: Secret Squirrel suggested: Copyright is a short-lived aberration (60-70 years ?), and technology is finally dealing with it. U. Check out Section 8 of the US Constitution. 1787.http://caselaw.findlaw.com/data/constitution/articles.html

RE: New Encryption System for Music (nytimes)

2000-07-05 Thread Tim May
At 12:22 PM -0400 7/5/00, David Honig wrote: At 01:28 AM 7/5/00 -0400, Secret Squirrel wrote: That is, unless analog recording equipment is criminalized and exterminated (illegal possession of a microphone - 5 years. Possession of a microphone while committing a copyright crime - 10 years.) All