On Sat, 19 Feb 2000, Tim May wrote:
It's also a waste of time to write FAQs, I've concluded. I suspected this
before, but now I know it for sure. Those who most need to read a FAQ are
usually the least likely to do so. Those who read widely don't _need_ a
FAQ. FAQs are thus mostly useful for
John Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is that old news or new, or merely a French counterattack
on Echelon-like espionage?
[Note from Matthew Gaylor: Nearly every security expert I know won't
use Windows on their personal machines. Everyone is aware of the
security issues that arise with
At 12:26 PM -0800 2/19/00, John Young wrote:
A French intelligence report alleges that Microsoft was
set up with NSA funding and that NSA imposed MS-DOS
on IBM, and also alleges that NSA agents are now working
at Microsoft:
http://cryptome.org/nsa-ms-spy.htm
The full confidential report has
Very well, your rebuttal would be an informative addition
to the file, if you don't object.
To pick up on a couple of your points:
There should be a sustained burst of activity from Europe
on the Echelon affair as EuroParl deliberates on it, guided by
the four 1999 Echelon reports prepared by
At 5:58 PM -0800 2/19/00, John Young wrote:
Very well, your rebuttal would be an informative addition
to the file, if you don't object.
Wayne Madsen is quoted today in Canada's National Post that
the EU hearings are a joke. That all nations spy on each other
and only a fool thinks otherwise:
