Gil Hamilton wrote:
Hence, the obvious solution is to make it *cost money to send mail*
(or to use any other network resource). Combine that with automated
reputation handling -- charge a small fee to accept mail from
"unknown" parties -- and this both reduces spam and shifts the cost of
- Original Message -
From: Alex B. Shepardsen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 2 Nov 2000, Kevin Elliott wrote:
You know, I don't like spammers any more than the next guy, but come
on. Unethical? we're not talking genocide and it's not like it
We ought to be. If spammers feared
Kevin Elliott wrote:
You know, I don't like spammers any more than the next guy, but come
on. Unethical? we're not talking genocide and it's not like it
cause significant (heck, even measurable) harm.
as a matter of fact, it does. the quantity of it, you know. if your 1
mio spam mails cause
On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Tom Vogt wrote:
You know, I don't like spammers any more than the next guy, but come
on. Unethical? we're not talking genocide and it's not like it
cause significant (heck, even measurable) harm.
as a matter of fact, it does. the quantity of it, you know. if your 1
mio
Sampo A Syreeni wrote:
I think it's more about the principle of it. No sane, sensible, tolerant
person would go as far as to try to regulate spam. Or, indeed, UBE-friendly
ISPs. But bulk mailing is such reprehensible behavior that it surely
deserves a pile of social and technological
TECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 1:40 PM
To: James Wilson; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: FW: BLOCK: ATT signs bulk hosting contract with spammers
At 07:40 -0800 11/1/00, James Wilson wrote:
If any of you get services from ATT you might want to start looking
for a
more ethical carrier (if on
At 11:36 AM -0800 11/3/00, Bill Stewart wrote:
(about ATT knowingly supporting Spam sites)
Fortunately, somebody got this to the right people at ATT;
otherwise I was going to have to contact the Sales VP (Hovancak)
whose name was on the contract and ask him to find the sales rep
who got
At 07:40 AM 11/1/00 -0800, James Wilson wrote:
If any of you get services from ATT you might want to start looking for a
more ethical carrier (if one exists) - ATT has been caught red handed
hosting spammers and promising not to terminate their services.
-Original Message-
From: Spam
James Wilson writes:
Does shifting the cost of millions of dollars every month on to other
businesses, individuals and governments qualify as "significant (heck,
even measurable) harm"? Yes.
Spam is VERY EXPENSIVE -- this document explains why...
If any of you get services from ATT you might want to start looking for a
more ethical carrier (if one exists) - ATT has been caught red handed
hosting spammers and promising not to terminate their services.
-
James D. Wilson, CCDA, MCP
"non sunt multiplicanda entia praeter necessitatem"
10 matches
Mail list logo
