Re: why should it be trusted?

2000-10-16 Thread Me
From: "Nathan Saper" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Already, with WTO/NAFTA/etc. regulations, corporations are often outside of the control of governments. Huh? Tarquin Fintimlinbin-Whinbimlim-Bus Stop F'Tang F'Tang Olé Biscuit-Barrel?

Re: New penalties to silence whistle blowers

2000-10-16 Thread Bill Stewart
At 04:43 PM 10/13/00 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://foxnews.com/national/101300/leaks.sml Congress Increases Penalty for Classified Leaks Friday, October 13, 2000 An intelligence bill passed by Congress could stifle the ability of whistle-blowers and the media to get information to

Re: Glass doors [was: Rijndael Hitachi] cpunk

2000-10-16 Thread Trei, Peter
-- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED][SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I wouldn't recommend boobytrapping the glass in that manner. I'd go with a ballistic laminate on the glass. [...] Ed At 02:51 PM 10/14/00 -0700, jim bell wrote: The solution is obvious, to a chemist. Make the glass

MGM - Apresenta 2 em 1

2000-10-16 Thread apoio
Title: Untitled Document 2 em 1 Escolha 2 dos seguintes filmes pelo preo de 1 O Homem da Mscara de Ferro Rain Man, Encontro de Irmos Rob Roy

why should it be trusted?

2000-10-16 Thread Jordan Dimov
I don't know much about crypto politics, but... isn't it utterly obvious that the mere fact that the NSA suggest a certain algorithm (say Rijndael) for a national standard and recomends its use internationally imply that they have a pretty darn good idea (if not actual technology) on how to

Re: Rijndael Hitachi

2000-10-16 Thread ..
Wouldn't an errant BB, baseball, etc. blow your house to matchsticks with this scenario? Or just all the glass, assuming you didn't do that yourself "Tim Allen-ing" this thing into place? I guess if you used just enough explosive to blow the glass into dust, you basically accomplish the bad guys

Re: why should it be trusted?

2000-10-16 Thread Joshua R. Poulson
I don't know much about crypto politics, but... isn't it utterly obvious that the mere fact that the NSA suggest a certain algorithm (say Rijndael) for a national standard and recomends its use internationally imply that they have a pretty darn good idea (if not actual technology) on how

Fire Your Boss!! 4932

2000-10-16 Thread chockiss37
FOLLOW ME TO FINANCIAL FREEDOM!! I Am looking for people with good work ethic and extrordinary desire to earn at least $10,000 per month working from home! NO SPECIAL SKILLS OR EXPERIENCE REQUIRED We will give you all the training and personal support you will need to

Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digital Environment (was Re: First Monday August 2000)

2000-10-16 Thread Arnold G. Reinhold
At 10:20 PM -0700 10/15/2000, Ed Gerck wrote: Arnold, Internet RFCs are technical specifications that use common English words in a strictly defined manner. To suggest that the use of names in computer code or Internet RFCs might have legal implications ... imagine lawyers examining some code

No Subject

2000-10-16 Thread ed.steele.91
_ Dear Friend, You can earn $46,000 or more in next the 90 days sending e-mail. Seem impossible? Read on for details (no, there is no "catch")... _ "AS SEEN ON

Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digital Environment (was Re: First Monday August 2000)

2000-10-16 Thread Mac Norton
Oh and as to non-repudiation and lawyers throwing that term around loosely: Most lawyers would probably tell you that, for their purposes, whatever the parties *agree* to be non-repudiation *is* non-repudiation as between *them*. The hard cases are the ones where there's no agreement and

Re: why should it be trusted?

2000-10-16 Thread Nathan Saper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 02:03:03AM -0400, Me wrote: From: "Nathan Saper" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Already, with WTO/NAFTA/etc. regulations, corporations are often outside of the control of governments. Huh? Tarquin Fintimlinbin-Whinbimlim-Bus Stop

Re: Non-Repudiation in the Digital Environment (was Re: First Monday August 2000)

2000-10-16 Thread Ed Gerck
Mac Norton wrote: Oh and as to non-repudiation and lawyers throwing that term around loosely: Most lawyers would probably tell you that, for their purposes, whatever the parties *agree* to be non-repudiation *is* non-repudiation as between *them*. Yes. The hard cases are the ones where

Re: why should it be trusted?

2000-10-16 Thread James A.. Donald
-- At 02:34 PM 10/15/2000 -0700, Nathan Saper wrote: IMHO, the NSA has enough expertise and technology to crack just about any cipher out there. James A. Donald: No it does not. The expertise of the NSA, great though it is, is small compared to the expertise outside the

Re: why should it be trusted?

2000-10-16 Thread Nathan Saper
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Oct 16, 2000 at 11:53:26PM -0400, Steve Furlong wrote: "Riad S. Wahby" wrote: Nathan Saper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Huh? Tarquin Fintimlinbin-Whinbimlim-Bus Stop F'Tang F'Tang Olé Biscuit-Barrel? Uh, what? This is a

Wireless Location Technology for 3G - Nortel / CambridgePositioning

2000-10-16 Thread Bill Stewart
Big Brother will know where you are. Advertisers will know where you are. But will *you* know where you are? Or when they know where you are? http://www.nortelnetworks.com/corporate/news/newsreleases/2000c/10_11_66 9_cambridge_positioning.html Nortel Networks, Cambridge Positioning Systems