On Thursday 18 January 2001 23:00, Reese wrote:
At 11:56 AM 1/18/01 -0600, Jim Burnes wrote:
On Thursday 18 January 2001 10:15, Declan McCullagh wrote:
Quite right. Ashcroft is objectionable, as is any candidate George W.
would propose, but he is arguably less objectionable than Reno
On Wednesday 10 January 2001 05:29, Ken Brown wrote:
...
The sun still doesn't set on the British Empire (not while we have
Pitcairn!), London is still the heart of darkness, it is is still the
place where the money is (most of the money in the world, by orders of
magnitude, is in
On Monday 08 January 2001 16:09, John Young wrote:
You are also commanded to bring with you the following
document(s) or object(s):
Please provide any and all documents, papers, letters, computer
disks, photographs, notes, objects, information, or other items
in your possession or
On Wed, 08 Nov 2000, R. A. Hettinga wrote:
At 10:36 AM -0500 on 11/8/00, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the citizens of Missouri chose to elect a deceased person as Senator,
I think
that's exactly what they should get.
Would that we were all so fortunate. Imagine, a whole senate full of dead
On Tue, 26 Sep 2000, Declan McCullagh wrote:
http://www.cluebot.com/article.pl?sid=00/09/22/0247244mode=thread
Methamphetamine Bill Resurfaces on Capitol Hill
posted by cicero on Saturday September 23, @04:43AM
from the accelerating-speed-bill dept.
Everyone thought the
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, Thomas B. Roach wrote:
AOL deciding what its users can write about makes about as much sense as
the company that manufactures paper telling you what you can write on
it, or Intel telling you what data your PC can compute.
While I agree with Tom that AOL sucks rocks etc
On Fri, 11 Aug 2000, T. Bankson Roach wrote:
Am I missing something? A paper company sells paper. It, unlike
"Assholes on Line" management, doesn't review what individual people
write on it.
Of course not. Like an ISP, the paper company sells you packets.
The data you put on the purchased
On Wed, 28 Jun 2000, Tim May wrote:
Unfortunately, cops are exempt from the laws when they solicit for
sex, offer child porn, sell drugs to people, plan break-ins, and even
arrange bombings. "Entrapment," hell, they are often the
_ringleaders_ in planning terrorist activities!
No
Anonymous wrote:
Negatives from film shot at Waco are missing, U.S. says
By WILLIAM H. FREIVOGEL and TERRY GANEY
St. Louis Post-Dispatch
April 18, 2000
- The Justice Department admits it can't not find the original negatives of an
important roll of film taken on the last day of the
"Colin A. Reed" wrote:
As opposed to the US, which still hasn't ratified the comprehensive
nuclear test ban treaty that it negotiated and shoved down the throats of
the rest of the world. And still hasn't paid it's back UN dues. And is
currently planning to violate the ABM treaty. I
10 matches
Mail list logo
