A quote from
http://www.thestandard.com/article/display/0,1151,20985,00.html:
" Criminal organizations appear to be using the proceeds of
IP-infringing products to facilitate a variety of enterprises,
including guns, drugs, pornography and even terrorism. Invariably,
when
use on screen keyboards using mouse action or use non-bios routines that
remap key codes.
If you need this level of security you probably need to look at the whole
environment and do some serious thinking.
If you use standard keyboards then the scancodes can be intercepted, if you
have standard
It's all well and good to hear this coming from a Congressman but this
is a Republican Congressman who is using it as a opportunity to attack a
Democratic Administration : should we read anything into this statement
regarding some significant difference between the two parties in regards
privacy
"Carskadden, Rush" wrote:
Well, hell, that's what I said.
Well I'll be! I guess you did!
But you make it sound so much more
_clear_. I don't remember who was saying that geodesic definition is
based solely on local information, but that appears to be the major
roadblock for our logic.
Bob,
We *do* all trade with our neighbors so your term is only trouble when
looking at the wrong part of the geometry. With trade the measure should
not be based on physical space or network geometry, those are transient
and permutable, rather the measure should be based on the proximity of
the
The device has extension ports that allow PCMCIA and Compact Flash.
These adapters are in the $50 range. There are wireless modems available
but they're fairly pricey : ~$350 for the modem, $50.month for the
service. All in all it looks pretty good. Schematics/specs open, Linux/X
already ported.
Jim,
The bloke with the extra ventilation notwithstanding, with an open OS
and open applications it seems easy to do pretty much whatever you want
with disk data and logs regardless of what the letter of the law says.
Electronic data is so malleable that its use as evidence seems
questionable to
However the recounts work out I think it's pretty clear that in the
statitical sense we have a tie. The uncertainties are far larger than
the measured difference. Even the national totals are within about 0.1%.
This is probably 1 or 2 orders of magnitude less than the percentage of
disqualified
"Trei, Peter" wrote:
Read the article. Of course the time is well known, and the logs
are stamped.
I meant naive in my guess at what level of detail was recorded. Wouldn't
those same logs and those of the Yankee's ISP also show that his IP address
and equipment was NOT connected at the time
This sounds a little far-fetched to me. At the very least there have to
be lots of items missed every day...
http://cryptome.org/dark-spy.htm
Mike
10 matches
Mail list logo
