Re: Fwd: Re: First Cypherpunks Physical Meeting Europe

2000-09-26 Thread Tom Vogt
Tim May wrote: What I didn't check was whether the _real_ list, Cypherpunks, was on the distribution list. It wasn't. The fuckheads out there who blather about being "coderpunks" and "cryptorights" warriors are not even posting to Cypherpunks. tim, don't make a fool of yourself. there's

Re: Fwd: Re: First Cypherpunks Physical Meeting Europe

2000-09-25 Thread Tom Vogt
Ulf Möller wrote: What I didn't check was whether the _real_ list, Cypherpunks, was on the distribution list. It wasn't. there've been several postings to the cypherpunks list about this, mostly by me. It's certainly not the first cypherpunks meeting in Europe, but it sounds interesting

Re: Fwd: Re: First Cypherpunks Physical Meeting Europe

2000-09-24 Thread Ulf Möller
On Sun, Sep 24, 2000 at 06:37:43PM -0700, Tim May wrote: What I didn't check was whether the _real_ list, Cypherpunks, was on the distribution list. It wasn't. It was sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and it did arrive in my cypherpunks mail folder. It's certainly not the first cypherpunks meeting