Re: CDR: Re: Julia Child was a Spook

2002-04-07 Thread jamesd
-- On 7 Apr 2002 at 13:31, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote: I'm sorry you've bought the terrorist line that it's all about US support for Israel. I know better. We could withdraw from the Middle East tomorrow, and all that would change would be the excuse. Possibly, but what does it benefit

Re: CDR: Re: Julia Child was a Spook

2002-04-06 Thread F. Marc de Piolenc
It's very important to distinguish propaganda from fact. It is indeed convenient to lable people you don't like terrorist - the Germans did that with the French resistance - but fortunately there are generally accepted definitions of that term against which propaganda labels can be tested, if you

Re: CDR: Re: Julia Child was a Spook

2002-04-06 Thread measl
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote: A terrorist attacks a target conveniently designated by him as SYMBOLIC of his chosen adversary; the target is preferably unsuspecting and undefended. The ultimate purpose is to frighten his adversary, or somebody with influence on that

Re: CDR: Re: Julia Child was a Spook

2002-04-06 Thread F. Marc de Piolenc
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You've been listening to Shrub to much. What makes you think this is about hating freedom? Might this not be about getting us to mind our own fucking business??? I really don't give a fig about the opinions of the current resident of the White House. I've been

Re: CDR: Re: Julia Child was a Spook

2002-04-06 Thread measl
On Sun, 7 Apr 2002, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You've been listening to Shrub to much. What makes you think this is about hating freedom? Might this not be about getting us to mind our own fucking business??? I really don't give a fig about the opinions of