On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 04:27 AM, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
What's good for the goose should be good for the gander, ya?
Nonsense. No reasonable definition of criminal conduct would put the US
government and al-Quaeda in the same category.
How about Criminal Conduct meaning
Petro wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 04:27 AM, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
What's good for the goose should be good for the gander, ya?
Nonsense. No reasonable definition of criminal conduct would put the US
government and al-Quaeda in the same category.
How about
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 07:53 PM, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
Petro wrote:
On Monday, January 14, 2002, at 04:27 AM, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
What's good for the goose should be good for the gander, ya?
Nonsense. No reasonable definition of criminal conduct would put the US
mattd wrote:
US violates the Geneva Convention
The US is a signatory to the Geneva Convention, which specifies the
conditions under which such prisoners are to be treated. The Convention
covers irregular forces such as al-Qaeda as well as regular armed forces,
Al-Quaeda is not a military
On Mon, 14 Jan 2002, F. Marc de Piolenc wrote:
mattd wrote:
US violates the Geneva Convention
The US is a signatory to the Geneva Convention, which specifies the
conditions under which such prisoners are to be treated. The Convention
covers irregular forces such as al-Qaeda as
