On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, David Honig wrote:
8 years ago the number who had a net-clue was small, and they were
a more tolerant bunch. Now you have every ditz in Tennessee trying
to shape the net to her liking, and getting men with guns to help.
Which is that 'freedom' thing, that is a good
At 08:39 AM 8/4/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, David Honig wrote:
8 years ago the number who had a net-clue was small, and they were
a more tolerant bunch. Now you have every ditz in Tennessee trying
to shape the net to her liking, and getting men with guns to help.
Which
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, David Honig wrote:
At 08:39 AM 8/4/01 -0500, Jim Choate wrote:
On Sat, 4 Aug 2001, David Honig wrote:
8 years ago the number who had a net-clue was small, and they were
a more tolerant bunch. Now you have every ditz in Tennessee trying
to shape the net to her
On Thu, 2 Aug -1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Use their spy cameras against dem. Learn dem to see ninjas. When dey
Actually, I'm thinking about using webcams streaming frame sequences
offsite (and sending video stills to your PDA via wireless) once the
interframe delta goes over threshold.
And,
It may well be irresponsible for Tim to talk about his probable
responses to a situation when unidentified black ninjas invade his
home. The reason it is arguably irresponsible is that Tim is endangering
his safety. But he knows that.
Talking about alleged victimless crimes allegedly committed
At 09:37 AM 8/1/01 -0700, Tim May wrote:
Exactly so. This list, like so many other lists, is gradually moving
toward public politics and the law as the focus of many members.
More public policy than public politics, but the general point is true.
I'm not sure what the reason is. Perhaps a
The prosecutors who read this list must be chortling.
Chortling is a form of laughter. Prosecutors, like Ukrainian customs
agents, have had their sense of humor surgically removed, so I doubt
they chortle very much.
On 2 Aug 2001, Dr. Evil wrote:
The prosecutors who read this list must be chortling.
Chortling is a form of laughter. Prosecutors, like Ukrainian customs
agents, have had their sense of humor surgically removed, so I doubt
they chortle very much.
unless it involves wounded kittens or
Sandy Sandfort[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Dildo blathered:
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Alan Olsen wrote:
...
The first rule of not being seen
is ''Don't stand up''.
That should be 'Don't stand out'.
If everyone else is standing up
you're toast.
Jimbo is obviously still
No Tim, what is utterly irresponsible is to make bellicose threats on this
list about what your response will be if masked ninjas invade your home. If
they end up shooting you (and I think their is a significant likelihood that
they will), it will be in large part because of your macho siege
by the lawyers
here (5, by my count) about what one mustn't do, how courts will
react, the need to be scrupulously legal in all of one's actions, etc.
Laws of mathematics, not men.
We risk becoming just a pale--a very, very pale!--imitation of the
Cyberia-L list.
--Tim May
--
Timothy C. May
Tim May wrote:
It is utterly irresponsible for
you to discuss this on a list
frequented by narcs and informants
and even prosecutors.
No Tim, what is utterly irresponsible is to make bellicose threats on this
list about what your response will be if masked ninjas invade your home. If
they
Tim May wrote:
The law part is about the above,
and exhortations by the lawyers
here (5, by my count) about what
one mustn't do, how courts will
react, the need to be scrupulously
legal in all of one's actions, etc.
Laws of mathematics, not men.
We risk becoming just a pale--a
very
At 10:17 AM -0700 8/1/01, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
It is on this second point that I had a very disappointing interaction with
Tim at a physical Cypherpunks meeting some years ago. Tim was carrying a
concealed knife that did not comply with California's concealed carry laws.
I mentioned this to
On Wed, 1 Aug 2001, Sandy Sandfort wrote:
1) Cypherpunks write code. This metaphorical admonition tells us to make
the laws irrelevant by outrunning them with technology. I couldn't agree
more. I don't see much benefit in asking the nice lawmakers to do fuck us
so badly, please. Better
The time for confidences is over. Lawyers are considering
a change in their ethics about ratting on clients (see NY Times
today); priests are ratting about criminal confessions; reporters
are ratting on interviewees, psychiatrists are ratting patients.
DoJ and the courts are squeezing all the
Tim May wrote:
I know of many arguments that a
knife can be gotten into a fight
and used effectively _faster_
than a gun can, especially in
very close quarters.
Maybe yes, maybe no, but why not carry both then? A legal knife and a
illegal (misdemeanor) gun rather than just your illegal
Eugene Leitl wrote:
Feds enter houses for whatever
reasons they deem appropriate
to invent...
Then my comments won't affect their actions one way or the other.
Pointing out possible targets
makes no damn reason at all...
Tim already is a target. My minor comments do nothing to change
--
On 1 Aug 2001, at 14:54, John Young wrote:
The time for confidences is over. Lawyers are considering
a change in their ethics about ratting on clients (see NY Times
today); priests are ratting about criminal confessions; reporters
are ratting on interviewees, psychiatrists are ratting
19 matches
Mail list logo
