John Washburn wrote:
I would think the problem with the camp X-Ray approach is the same as
happened historically in Botany Bay or fictionally in the Moon is a
Harsh Mistress.
When (not if) the ongoing support of the penal colony collapses what
happens?
The children are in legal limbo; neither
John Washburn wrote:
I would think the problem with the camp X-Ray approach is the same as
happened historically in Botany Bay or fictionally in the Moon is a
Harsh Mistress.
When (not if) the ongoing support of the penal colony collapses what
happens?
The children are in legal limbo; neither
an interplanetary war of secession?
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Durden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Lunar Colony
Interesting OpEd piece in the NYT today pointing out
]
Subject: RE: Lunar Colony
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, John Washburn wrote:
I would think the problem with the camp X-Ray approach is the same as
happened historically in Botany Bay or fictionally in the Moon is a
Harsh Mistress.
When (not if) the ongoing support of the penal colony collapses what
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, John Washburn wrote:
I would think the problem with the camp X-Ray approach is the same as
happened historically in Botany Bay or fictionally in the Moon is a
Harsh Mistress.
When (not if) the ongoing support of the penal colony collapses what
happens?
The children
]
Subject: RE: Lunar Colony
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, John Washburn wrote:
I would think the problem with the camp X-Ray approach is the same as
happened historically in Botany Bay or fictionally in the Moon is a
Harsh Mistress.
When (not if) the ongoing support of the penal colony collapses what
On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, John Washburn wrote:
I would think the problem with the camp X-Ray approach is the same as
happened historically in Botany Bay or fictionally in the Moon is a
Harsh Mistress.
When (not if) the ongoing support of the penal colony collapses what
happens?
The children
an interplanetary war of secession?
-Original Message-
From: Tyler Durden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 3:22 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Lunar Colony
Interesting OpEd piece in the NYT today pointing out
],'Justin'
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Lunar Colony
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2004 21:20:51 -0500
At 04:39 PM 1/15/04 -0500, Trei, Peter wrote:
...
Interesting OpEd piece in the NYT today pointing out that
a manned Mars expedition becomes *much* more affordable if
no return trip
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:11, Justin wrote:
Trei, Peter (2004-01-15 21:39Z) wrote:
Interesting OpEd piece in the NYT today pointing out that
a manned Mars expedition becomes *much* more affordable if
no return trip is planned.
This is obvious. More affordable, but more risk. We might
will allow the ragheads to win. A lunar colony
within 10 years will certainly bankrupt the U.S. given our current
financial situation. Does anyone think it will take less than trillions
of dollars to establish a moon base? It takes close to a billion
dollars just to launch a 20-year-old, poorly designed
But bankrupting America will allow the ragheads to win. A lunar colony
within 10 years will certainly bankrupt the U.S. given our current
financial situation. Does anyone think it will take less than trillions
of dollars to establish a moon base? It takes close to a billion
dollars just
Pete Capelli (2004-01-15 20:12Z) wrote:
Of course, bankrupting the U.S. and getting a base on the moon are both
useful objectives. With no financially viable country owning the lunar
outpost, things could get quite interesting.
Can't we just match this up with the 60% of the federal
Justin wrote:
Does anyone think it will take less than trillions
of dollars to establish a moon base?
The more realistic numbers I've heard are $400 billion
for a moon base, double that for a Mars mission. I don't
know the incremental cost to sustain the moonbase.
Interesting OpEd piece in the
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 12:00, Tyler Durden wrote:
Even more importantly, we can basically make the entire moon the perfect
model of American culture in action, without any other nation to contest our
policies there. It could be a paradise, and since no terrorists or ragheads
will be
Trei, Peter (2004-01-15 21:39Z) wrote:
Does anyone think it will take less than trillions
of dollars to establish a moon base?
The more realistic numbers I've heard are $400 billion
for a moon base, double that for a Mars mission. I don't
know the incremental cost to sustain the moonbase.
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 16:11, Justin wrote:
Trei, Peter (2004-01-15 21:39Z) wrote:
Interesting OpEd piece in the NYT today pointing out that
a manned Mars expedition becomes *much* more affordable if
no return trip is planned.
This is obvious. More affordable, but more risk. We might
Thank goodness Mr Bush is finally thinking long term.
Not only will the Lunar Base focus all of our attention away from the wars
and other nastiness down here, it will get us to the moon before Al Qaeda
and bin Laden ever have a chance to start spreading their filthy ideas
there. If we control
But bankrupting America will allow the ragheads to win. A lunar colony
within 10 years will certainly bankrupt the U.S. given our current
financial situation. Does anyone think it will take less than trillions
of dollars to establish a moon base? It takes close to a billion
dollars just
Pete Capelli (2004-01-15 20:12Z) wrote:
Of course, bankrupting the U.S. and getting a base on the moon are both
useful objectives. With no financially viable country owning the lunar
outpost, things could get quite interesting.
Can't we just match this up with the 60% of the federal
Justin wrote:
Does anyone think it will take less than trillions
of dollars to establish a moon base?
The more realistic numbers I've heard are $400 billion
for a moon base, double that for a Mars mission. I don't
know the incremental cost to sustain the moonbase.
Interesting OpEd piece in the
On Thu, 2004-01-15 at 12:00, Tyler Durden wrote:
Even more importantly, we can basically make the entire moon the perfect
model of American culture in action, without any other nation to contest our
policies there. It could be a paradise, and since no terrorists or ragheads
will be
Trei, Peter (2004-01-15 21:39Z) wrote:
Does anyone think it will take less than trillions
of dollars to establish a moon base?
The more realistic numbers I've heard are $400 billion
for a moon base, double that for a Mars mission. I don't
know the incremental cost to sustain the moonbase.
23 matches
Mail list logo
