On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:25:01 +0100 (CET)
From: Nomen Nescio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RIAA turns against Hollings bill
The New York Times is reporting at
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/14/technology
Nomen Nescio schrieb am Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:25:01AM +0100:
[...]
a threat of a mandated Trusted Computing technology, how bad is it for
the system to be offered in a free market?
Let technology companies decide whether to offer Palladium technology
on their computers or not. Let content
Nomen said:
How does this latest development change the picture? If there is no
Hollings bill, does this mean that Trusted Computing will be voluntary,
as its proponents have always claimed? And if we no longer have such
a threat of a mandated Trusted Computing technology, how bad is it for
The New York Times is reporting at
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/14/technology/14CND-PIRACY.html that
the Recording Industry Association of America, along with two computer
and technology industry trade groups, has agreed not to seek new
government regulations to mandate technological controls
How does this latest development change the picture? If there is no
Hollings bill, does this mean that Trusted Computing will be voluntary,
as its proponents have always claimed? And if we no longer have such
a threat of a mandated Trusted Computing technology, how bad is it for
the system
John Gilmore[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
Nomen writes:
How does this latest development change the picture? If there is no
Hollings bill, does this mean that Trusted Computing will be voluntary,
as its proponents have always claimed? And if we no longer have such
a threat
I have a news analysis up at News.com that, perhaps, may shed some
light on what's actually going on:
http://news.com.com/2100-1023-980671.html
-Declan
On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:25:01AM +0100, Nomen Nescio wrote:
The New York Times is reporting at
John Gilmore[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] writes:
Nomen writes:
How does this latest development change the picture? If there is no
Hollings bill, does this mean that Trusted Computing will be voluntary,
as its proponents have always claimed? And if we no longer have such
a threat
Nomen Nescio schrieb am Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 01:25:01AM +0100:
[...]
a threat of a mandated Trusted Computing technology, how bad is it for
the system to be offered in a free market?
Let technology companies decide whether to offer Palladium technology
on their computers or not. Let content
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Nomen Nescio wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 01:25:01 +0100 (CET)
From: Nomen Nescio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RIAA turns against Hollings bill
The New York Times is reporting at
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/14/technology
Nomen said:
How does this latest development change the picture? If there is no
Hollings bill, does this mean that Trusted Computing will be voluntary,
as its proponents have always claimed? And if we no longer have such
a threat of a mandated Trusted Computing technology, how bad is it for
The New York Times is reporting at
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/14/technology/14CND-PIRACY.html that
the Recording Industry Association of America, along with two computer
and technology industry trade groups, has agreed not to seek new
government regulations to mandate technological controls
It makes me wonder just what kind of backroom deal was cut in the
negotiations.
On Wed, 15 Jan 2003, Nomen Nescio wrote:
The New York Times is reporting at
http://www.nytimes.com/2003/01/14/technology/14CND-PIRACY.html that
the Recording Industry Association of America, along with two
13 matches
Mail list logo
