On Wed, Apr 14, at 08:22PM, Justin wrote:
| I'm not concerned with the advertising itself. My concern is that the
| Gmail service would provide an unacceptable level of detail on message
| content to whoever's monitoring the advertisement logs.
I only say something because I have
At 01:22 PM 4/14/2004, Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not concerned with the advertising itself. My concern is that the
Gmail service would provide an unacceptable level of detail on message
content to whoever's monitoring the advertisement logs.
Unacceptable to whom, and what should
On Wed, Apr 14, at 08:22PM, Justin wrote:
| I'm not concerned with the advertising itself. My concern is that the
| Gmail service would provide an unacceptable level of detail on message
| content to whoever's monitoring the advertisement logs.
I only say something because I have
At 01:22 PM 4/14/2004, Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not concerned with the advertising itself. My concern is that the
Gmail service would provide an unacceptable level of detail on message
content to whoever's monitoring the advertisement logs.
Unacceptable to whom, and what should
Dave Howe (2004-04-13 14:11Z) wrote:
Justin wrote:
It's not just a private interaction between two consenting parties.
It's a contract that grants power to a third party eliminating
traditional legal guarantees of quasi-privacy in communication from
sender to recipient, one of which is
Dave Howe (2004-04-13 14:11Z) wrote:
Justin wrote:
It's not just a private interaction between two consenting parties.
It's a contract that grants power to a third party eliminating
traditional legal guarantees of quasi-privacy in communication from
sender to recipient, one of which is
On Tuesday 2004 April 13 17:26, sunder wrote:
Pete Capelli wrote:
Since when is there a guarantee of privacy in email??
Smartass reply Since PhilZ wrote PGP?/Smartass reply
But then, only if you use PGP (or GnuPG or what have you).
--
Shawn K. Quinn
Riad S. Wahby wrote:
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A California state senator on Monday said
she was drafting legislation to block Google Inc.'s free e-mail
service Gmail because it would place advertising in personal
messages after searching them for key words.
Is she planning to block all the
On Mon, 12 Apr 2004, Riad S. Wahby wrote:
A private interaction between two consenting parties has absolutely
nothing to do with the state, period. The bitch supporting this shit
should be removed from office forthwith.
And based on this [quite valid] criteria, we should remove 90+ percent
Riad S. Wahby (2004-04-13 01:49Z) wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyu=/nm/20040412/wr_nm/tech_google_dc_1
A private interaction between two consenting parties has absolutely
nothing to do with the state, period. The bitch supporting this shit
should be removed from office
Justin wrote:
It's not just a private interaction between two consenting parties.
It's a contract that grants power to a third party eliminating
traditional legal guarantees of quasi-privacy in communication from
sender to recipient, one of which is not a party to the contract.
There's no
Justin [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Riad S. Wahby (2004-04-13 01:49Z) wrote:
http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=storyu=/nm/20040412/wr_nm/tech_google_dc_1
A private interaction between two consenting parties has absolutely
nothing to do with the state, period. The bitch supporting this shit
Really, what's the difference between scanning the message in order to,
say, render HTML tags it may contain, and scanning it in order to
generate targetted advertising based on keywords it contains?
That's irrelevant. These arguments that Gmail is just like other services
are nothing but red
On Tuesday 2004 April 13 17:26, sunder wrote:
Pete Capelli wrote:
Since when is there a guarantee of privacy in email??
Smartass reply Since PhilZ wrote PGP?/Smartass reply
But then, only if you use PGP (or GnuPG or what have you).
--
Shawn K. Quinn
Riad S. Wahby wrote:
SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) - A California state senator on Monday said
she was drafting legislation to block Google Inc.'s free e-mail
service Gmail because it would place advertising in personal
messages after searching them for key words.
Is she planning to block all the
15 matches
Mail list logo
