Karsten M. Self [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was spooning from the top of my head. It's more generally known as
the RSA public key encryption patent, released by RSA September 6, 2000:
http://www.rsasecurity.com/news/pr/000906-1.html
I don't have the patent number handy but could
[My apologies to the list for continuing this thread. I should know
better.]
On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Karsten M. Self wrote:
Incorrect. There is no PGP/MIME support in Outlook, and the Eudora
PGP/MIME handling is less than perfect.
My information is different, though I've not used Outlook in
Meyer Wolfsheim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- It's not that Mutt doesn't play well with others (and yes, I'm aware
No, it's Mutt users who don't play well with others.
Be fair. I rewrote much of the PGP functionality in Mutt just so I
could send PGP-signed messages to this list without
On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 01:42:19AM -0700, Karsten M. Self wrote:
I'm not set up to run same, but I'm interested in finding one that
doesn't demime.
http://www.lne.com/cpunk
has an up-to-date list of the different CDRs and their policies.
Eric
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
on Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 01:24:44PM -0700, Meyer Wolfsheim ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
...
For the most part, Mutt is an excellent email client. However, I'm
actually going to correct myself, and say that it *is* Mutt that doesn't
play well with
