--
Reading the Wifi report,
http://www.weca.net/OpenSection/pdf/Wi-
Fi_Protected_Access_Overview.pdf
it seems their customers stampeded them and demanded that the
security hole be fixed, fixed a damned lot sooner than they
intended to fix it.
I am struck the contrast between the seemingly
[Moderator's note: FYI: no pragma is needed. This is what C's volatile
keyword is for.
No it isn't. This was done to death on vuln-dev, see the list archives for
the discussion.
Peter.
While this clarification may be true, the government should realize that the
unconstitutional 'deep secret' library searches of the PATRIOT act render such rumors
as credible, causing their actions to be treated with deep suspicion even when the
actions may be legitimate. [We saw this in the
At 09:20 AM 11/07/2002 -0800, our local weapon of mass destruction forwarded:
Sharon Shea-Keneally, principal of Mount Anthony Union High School in
Bennington, Vermont, was shocked when she received a
letter in May from military recruiters demanding a list of all her
students, including names,
At 05:46 AM 11/7/02 -0800, Sarad AV wrote:
hi,
Wi fi customers are more paranoid than comparingly
ordinary web users who are not so concerened of their
security.
That's just plain silly. Its like saying a cellphone user is more
paranoid than a landline user. It was entirely convenience,
with
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Gutmann writes
:
[Moderator's note: FYI: no pragma is needed. This is what C's volatile
keyword is for.
No it isn't. This was done to death on vuln-dev, see the list archives for
the discussion.
[Moderator's note: I'd be curious to hear a summary -- it
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, James A. Donald wrote:
--
Reading the Wifi report,
http://www.weca.net/OpenSection/pdf/Wi-
Fi_Protected_Access_Overview.pdf
it seems their customers stampeded them and demanded that the
security hole be fixed, fixed a damned lot sooner than they
intended to fix it.
James A. Donald[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
Reading the Wifi report,
http://www.weca.net/OpenSection/pdf/Wi-
Fi_Protected_Access_Overview.pdf
it seems their customers stampeded them and demanded that the
security hole be fixed, fixed a damned lot sooner than they
intended to fix it.
Kevin Elliott wrote:
The point is though, that according to C99 today
volatile int myflag;
myflag=0;
if (myflag!=0) { do stuff } ;
does _exactly_ what you want, per the spec. The only compilers that
don't work this way are by definition out of spec, so adding new
stuff isn't going to
--
On 7 Nov 2002 at 16:36, Trei, Peter wrote:
The 'volatile' keyword seems to have poorly defined
behaviour.
Volatile memory typically both receives input from outside
the abstract machine, and generates output outside the abstract
machine. Indeed the expected reason to write to
At 03:55 PM 11/7/02 +0100, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Regardless of whether one uses volatile or a pragma, the basic point
remains: cryptographic application writers have to be aware of what a
clever compiler can do, so that they know to take countermeasures.
Wouldn't a crypto coder be
At 03:55 PM 11/7/02 +0100, Steven M. Bellovin wrote:
Regardless of whether one uses volatile or a pragma, the basic point
remains: cryptographic application writers have to be aware of what a
clever compiler can do, so that they know to take countermeasures.
Wouldn't a crypto coder be using
From: Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Moderator's note: FYI: no pragma is needed. This is what C's
volatile keyword is for. Unfortunately, not everyone writing in C
knows the language. --Perry]
Thanks for the reminder about volatile. It is an ancient and valuable
feature of C and I suppose
From: Trei, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[Moderator's note: FYI: no pragma is needed. This is what C's
volatile keyword is for. Unfortunately, not everyone writing in C
knows the language. --Perry]
Thanks for the reminder about volatile. It is an ancient and valuable
feature of C and I suppose
Hello Jason:
Page 193 and 210 do talk about having an identifying
value encoded in the credentials which the holder can
prove is or isn't the same as in other credentials. However,
the discussion on page 193 is with respect to building
digital pseudonyms
No, not at all. The paragraph on page
15 matches
Mail list logo
