To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [anarchy_africa]
Anarcho-socialism?
I'm pretty new to the list, so I don't know how much of this has been said
before, but I have a couple things to add on the issue of sectarianism.
First, I think some Latin American anarchists, under the banner of
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Eugen Leitl wrote:
I have a related question. I have a little server sitting in a wall
closet. Does anyone have an easy solution (preferably low tech) for
figuring out that the closet door has been opened?
from a kids cartoon a couple weeks ago: put a bowl of marbles next
hi,
--- Jim Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Sarad AV wrote:
Does a paradox ever help in understanding any
thing?
Yes, it can demonstrate that you aren't asking the
right questions within
the correct context.
okay.
2.Gödel asks for the program and the
The following is a documentlist obtained from the danish
ministry of information technology and science concerning the
international law enforcement telecommunications seminar ILETS 97 held
january 1997 in Dublin.
I haven't been able to locate the documents listed and all FOIA-requests
concerning
I'm failing to understand what it so new about specifismo. I've been
arguing for a strategy like this for many years, as have many anarchists. It
sounds like something related to practical anarchism and ecumenical
anarchism which have been focuses of my work for many years. I think the
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 12:23:51PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
On Tuesday, December 31, 2002, at 11:41 AM, Michael Cardenas wrote:
How do you all see the future use of biologically based systems
affecting cryptography in general?
By biologically based systems I mean machine learning, genetic
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Michael Cardenas wrote:
People do break cyphers, by finding weaknesses in them. Are you saying
that you think that current cyphers are unbreakable?
People break cyphers by
1) cryptoanalysis (mostly brain, a bit of muscle)
2) brute force (no brain at all, pure muscle)
So
On Wednesday 01 January 2003 09:28, Jim Choate wrote:
... If I as an individual can not
decide to take anothers life at my whim (ie 'convicted' by individual
ethics) how than can a group of men do it? Can a group of men have a
right that as individuals they do not? No. Ergo, the state has no
At 01:40 PM 12/27/2002 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002, Anonymous wrote:
to have an encrypted tunnel materialize through blacknet, but I
strongly doubt this will scale to millions of users very well.
Instead of doubting, try creating a model that might work, and test drive
it in
At 01:46 PM 12/31/02 -0800, Bill Stewart wrote:
...
The scalability of the problem is much different depending on your goals.
If you want to sort through the transcriptions of people who
bought drugs and knives and airline tickets but no luggage
in an effort to find potential terrorists, that's
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Tim May wrote:
* I expect most uses of customer courtesy cards are to try to get
some kind of brand loyalty going. People thinking Well, I have a card
at Albertson's, but not at Safeway, so I'll go to Albertson's.
They'd love that, but know better.
* Dossier-compiling
Actually, Tyler Durden (ie, me) wrote what is attributed to the generic
anonymous name of Norman Nescio. Anyway,...
Part of the problem is that the detection equipment is many fermions
looking at single particles. I think QM is easier to understand when
looking at an ion trap. There are lots
Michael Cardenas wrote:
But what if this data is used as part of a larger picture, such as in
TIA. It definitely can be used, along with gas purchases, to track
where a suspect, aka a citizen, is living. Also, many possible
weapons such as perscription drugs, box cutters, and kitchen knives
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Todd Boyle wrote:
Its not enough to put the chips next to the beer. They want
to examining the layout of all their shelf space.
The cash register data alone, is enough to do this, but
it doesn't work very well for shoppers who come and
buy chips on tuesday and beer on
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, Michael Cardenas wrote:
People do break cyphers, by finding weaknesses in them. Are you saying
that you think that current cyphers are unbreakable?
Also, what about using biological systems to create strong cyphers,
not to break them?
We do pretty good already don't we
At 07:12 PM 1/1/2003, Mike Rosing wrote:
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Tim May wrote:
* I expect most uses of customer courtesy cards are to try to get
some kind of brand loyalty going. People thinking Well, I have a card
at Albertson's, but not at Safeway, so I'll go to Albertson's.
They'd love
On Tue, 31 Dec 2002, Tyler Durden wrote:
Actually, Tyler Durden (ie, me) wrote what is attributed to the generic
anonymous name of Norman Nescio. Anyway,...
Yeah, the TD gave that away :-)
With all due respect, Pooey Dr Mike. Take a nice, straightforward EPR using
two correlated photons
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 10:26:40 -0500, you wrote:
http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2002/Dec-21-Sat-2002/news/20327620.html
Las Vegas Review Journal
Saturday, December 21, 2002
Hiibel refused to identify himself during a May 2000 stop just outside of
Winnemucca because he did not believe
Easy, the particles are correlated at birth. *they* know what their
orientation is, it is fixed at birth. The math says *we* don't know.
No. Bell's inequality tells us that there are no hidden variables. It's not that we
don't know the value of the measureable prior to wavefunction
At 08:55 PM 1/1/03 -0800, Michael Cardenas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 31, 2002 at 12:23:51PM -0800, Tim May wrote:
...
Strong crypto is, ipso facto, resistant to all of the above. For the
obvious reason that the specific solution to a cipher is like a Dirac
delta function (a spike) rising above a
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Anonymous wrote:
No. Bell's inequality tells us that there are no hidden variables.
It's not that we don't know the value of the measureable prior to
wavefunction collapse...the specific measureable doesn't exist prior to
wavefunction collapse. When Bell formulated the
But in the end, as strange and unreasonable as this action-at-a-distance may
be, it's now regularly seen in the laboratory. (Even wierder are the 'quantum
eraser' and other bizarre behaviors).
Is there any practical way to translate this into doll-and-needles method of
punishing modelled
22 matches
Mail list logo
