Re: constant encryped stream

2003-01-04 Thread Michael Shields
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], Peter Fairbrother [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Get the pull from a party popper and wrap it in a dollar bill. Record the serial number of the bill (some crypto here maybe). Make it impossible to open the closet without setting the pull off, ie no trapdoor. Fairly

Re: constant encryped stream

2003-01-04 Thread Peter Fairbrother
Get the pull from a party popper and wrap it in a dollar bill. Record the serial number of the bill (some crypto here maybe). Make it impossible to open the closet without setting the pull off, ie no trapdoor. Fairly good tamper-evidence, and the token is hard (and very illegal!) to forge. Also

Re: Subject: CDR: Re: QM, EPR, A/B

2003-01-04 Thread Jim Choate
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, blah wrote: 'instantaneously' from -whose- perspective? From anyone's perspective. Not from the photons perspective, from a photons perspective there is -no- time. It is clear from Relativity that as -anything- approaches the speed of light it's mass grows larger

Re: CDR: François Marc de Piolenc and US Intelligence.,

2003-01-04 Thread Marc de Piolenc
Ah - I see. You just wanted to resurrect a tired old joke. O-kay - another line in the filter... Marc NOTE FOR ATTENDANT(S): Increase Thorazine. Matthew X wrote: Okay I forgot,army intelligence is an oxymoron...lookie here arschloch...

Re: Liars Paradox Fermi paradox

2003-01-04 Thread Sarad AV
hi, thank you. what about this http://xray.sai.msu.ru/~lipunov/text/ashkl/node3.html http://www.transhumanism.ndtilda.co.uk/Fermi.htm it says There has been much speculation around Fermi's famous question: Where are they? Why haven't we seen any traces of intelligent extraterrestrial life?.

Re: CDR: Re: Many Worlds Version of Fermi Paradox

2003-01-04 Thread Jim Choate
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote: how do you know that apples and oranges are not same or are same? Its the way you look at it. No, ever see Apple and Oranges cross-breed? -THEY- look at it that way too. So there -is- something there to the cladistic viewpoint. --

Subject: CDR: Re: QM, EPR, A/B

2003-01-04 Thread blah
Date: Wed, 1 Jan 2003 00:28:46 -0600 (CST) Jim Choate wrote: Tim May wrote... I don't believe, necessarily, in certain forms of the Copenhagen Interpretation, especially anything about signals propagating instantaneously, 'instantaneously' from -whose- perspective? From anyone's

Re: QM, A-B, and the Z

2003-01-04 Thread Jim Choate
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Anonymous via the Cypherpunks Tonga Remailer wrote: And no, Relativity and QM have -not- been joined into a -single cohesive theory-. You have to qualify this. No, I don't. General relativity has not been unified with quantum mechanics in any way that is universally

Re: CDR: Re: Many Worlds Version of Fermi Paradox

2003-01-04 Thread Sarad AV
hi, --- Jim Choate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote: As you already see-what you say is correct for your definition of proof and axiom. Here is the fundamental error in your thinking, you are trying to argue apples and oranges. how do you know that

Re: CDR: Re: Liars Paradox Fermi paradox

2003-01-04 Thread Jim Choate
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote: There has been much speculation around Fermi's famous question: Where are they? Why haven't we seen any traces of intelligent extraterrestrial life?. One way in which this question has been answered (Brin 1983) is that we have not seen any traces of

Re: Using Brin to thwart ISP subpoenas

2003-01-04 Thread Steve Schear
At 12:41 PM 1/3/2003 -0500, you wrote: On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 06:16:48PM -0500, Trei, Peter wrote: A year or two ago, I suggested to someone associated with http://www.thebunker.com (an ISP based in an underground ex-RAF bunker in Britain) that they set up a web-accessible camera on the

Re: Dossiers and Customer Courtesy Cards

2003-01-04 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Wed, 1 Jan 2003, John Kelsey wrote: It's worth pointing out that if you can afford to do the computerized part of this search for your top 16 suspects today, you'll be able to do it for your top thousand suspects in less than ten years, just assuming processing and storage gets cheaper at

Re: Liars Paradox Fermi paradox

2003-01-04 Thread Mike Rosing
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote: So does the fermi paradox mean that there are no extra terrestrials.Can't we throw away this paradox like every other paradox? It's easier to assume we don't know what we're looking for. That's not a paradox at all. If you measure the same thing under

Re: CDR: Re: Liars Paradox Fermi paradox

2003-01-04 Thread Jim Choate
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Mike Rosing wrote: On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote: So does the fermi paradox mean that there are no extra terrestrials.Can't we throw away this paradox like every other paradox? It's easier to assume we don't know what we're looking for. That's not a paradox

Re: Dossiers and Customer Courtesy Cards

2003-01-04 Thread Sunder
Not in any 1U system that I know of unless you mean multiple racks. The biggest ATA drives I see on the market today are 200GB. Most 1U systems won't hold more than two of these. That's nowhere near 1TB! Also you're forgetting about doing backups; and I don't know about you, but I get a

Re: Liars Paradox Fermi paradox

2003-01-04 Thread Bill Stewart
At 12:39 AM 01/04/2003 -0800, Sarad AV wrote: There has been much speculation around Fermi's famous question: Where are they? Why haven't we seen any traces of intelligent extraterrestrial life?. One way in which this question has been answered (Brin 1983) is that we have not seen any traces of