On Sunday, August 31, 2003, at 06:16 PM, Steve Furlong wrote:
On Sunday 31 August 2003 19:20, James A. Donald wrote:
Talk is cheap. ...
Indeed, the one may be
connected to the other -- the absence of stoolies may well be
connected to the presence of hot talk.
Dunno. I'm not sure that mere talk
On Sunday, August 31, 2003, at 04:20 PM, James A. Donald wrote:
--
Tim May is the perfect example why vigilante justice is
generally considered to be a bad thing -- stupid assholes
like Tim May spout off take action based on paranoia
instead of facts principles of anarchy instead of
Tim May:
If cops ask local neighborhood members to report any suspicious
activity, the folks know that any benefits they gain from acting as
informants tend to be a lot smaller than the danger of being beat up or
even killed by the Mafia.
When the cost of acting as an informant is zero,
On Sunday 31 August 2003 19:20, James A. Donald wrote:
Talk is cheap. ...
Indeed, the one may be
connected to the other -- the absence of stoolies may well be
connected to the presence of hot talk.
Dunno. I'm not sure that mere talk of killing a librarian would dissuade
the potential
Of interest to many here, I am sure. Tim: hide your eyes...
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Every living thing dies alone.
Donnie Darko
--- FORWARDED MESSAGE ---
I don't know how many people have seen this already...
Interesting new data
John:
..
a) admit that your stupid, self-appointed-netcop blacklists
and self-righteous spam projects are inherently flawed, and
..
Please spend your sophomore year working on something besides
self-appointed-spam-netcop-site-of-the-week.
..
..., and don't require
some asshole swooping in
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Anonymous wrote:
Some librarians are probably now thinking they have a patriotic duty to
see what people are reading and to report any suspicious behavior.
Part of the intent of the Patriot Act and the Library Awareness Program
was to bamboozle the nation's librarians
I wasn't even going to answer the absurd hypothetical, but since it's now
in play...
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003, Sunder wrote:
In that case, I would suspect the ISP itself would have incoming/outgoing
feeds from other ISP's.
Obviously, every ISP does.
If that single moral objector ISP refuses to
What Tim is (correctly) observing here is that a working challenge to the force
monopoly is a very effective way to modify behaviour.
Where Tim is wrong, though, is that he may have anything resembling a working
challenge.
=
end
(of original message)
Y-a*h*o-o (yes, they scan for this)
An Metet (2003-09-01 05:54Z) wrote:
Here's a clue. If and when crypto anarchy ever becomes a reality,
Tim May is going to be one of the first ones killed. He's pissed off
too many people. Once they can get retribution anonymously, his days
are numbered.
Are we talking about the tendency
Does anyone have any source code or algos for Philips CRYPTO1 stream cipher
as used in their MIFARE products?
In that case, I would suspect the ISP itself would have incoming/outgoing
feeds from other ISP's. If that single moral objector ISP refuses to
allow carnivores, the other, not quite as moral ISP's might be persuaded
to allow it, in which case the fedZ get what they want, just one
traceroute hop
At 12:02 PM 8/31/03 -0700, Tim May wrote:
He said: An ISP is free to say anyone requesting a tap is required to
pay a fee, just as any ISP is free to say that it will handle
installation of special Carnivore equipment for a certain fee.
A customer of the ISP is certainly _not_ the one requesting
At 11:03 AM 9/1/03 +0200, Andrew Thomas wrote:
b) realize that the distributed method you suggest already
exists - it is called procmail(*).
Procmail serves no purpose by itself. It requires no small
amount of effort on the part of the administrator to utilise
for any type of systems
At 01:54 AM 9/1/03 -0400, An Metet wrote:
Here's a clue. If and when crypto anarchy ever becomes a reality,
Tim May is going to be one of the first ones killed. He's pissed off
too many people. Once they can get retribution anonymously, his days
are numbered.
What, exactly, has Tim done that
At 08:06 PM 8/31/03 -0700, Tim May wrote:
The Mob doesn't actually have to kill too many stoolies for it to be
widely known that ratting can be a very dangerous business.
Ask David Kelly. Or his associates. Reputation is a tool.
On Monday, September 1, 2003, at 12:03 PM, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
The risk is not one terrorists have to fear. The biggest problem with
the librarian narc program is the same as most of these anti-terrorism
measures: completely innocent people are harassed, arrested, or placed
under suspicion.
On Monday 01 September 2003 05:03, Andrew Thomas wrote:
The above is useful information. Specifically, the recognition
of duplicate mail receipts is a concept that is new to me, though
that would require that both email addresses would receive an
equal amount of 'publicity' on newsgroups,
J.A. Terranson (2003-09-01 04:33Z) wrote:
which, curiously, shows Boulder with zero full-time DHS employees but
San Miguel (Telluride) with 7!
That must be where all the terrorists ski.
--
No man is clever enough to Times are bad. Children no longer
know all the evil he does.
Indeed. Despite all of Tim's rage, we're still just rats in a cage, and
despite Tim's urging of necklacing ISP owners, or other foam at the mouth
arm-chair solutions, Occam's razor still supplies the better, and cleaner
solutions:
If your MTA has it, turn on the START TLS option. If it doesn't,
I'm keeping this one. It's tendng to the condition of poetry.
John Young wrote:
[...]
Commies, now there's a diversion fabricated in the propaganda
mills by ideological word-toolers of capitalists and socialists,
heeding the marketplace rule 1: concoct a worse evil to send
the pack howling
This piece of political PR was sent to a mailing list intended for
internal reporting of computer problems at a university, so was
obviously automatically grabbed. Maybe someone sold them a list of
ac.uk addresses.
Dr Sean Gabb wrote:
2nd September 2003
Dear Educator,
We are writing to
Whoops - apologies for stupid posting here caused by /me/ being a
prat with my mail program.
Though the message body it isn't entirely off-topic here - the
subject line is quite unrelated to it. Mea culpa.
Ken
ken wrote:
This piece of political PR was sent to a mailing list intended for
Several months ago, I read about someone who was making a key that
was difficult if not impossible to copy. They mixed sparkly things
into a plastic resin and let them set. A camera would take a picture
of the object and pass the location of the sparkly parts through a
hash function to produce
Steve Schear wrote:
It would seems that the means may soon be at hand for using WiFi, or
WiFi-like, equipment to create ad hoc, meshed, non-commercial networks.
The means are at hand, have been at hand for quite a few years
in the form of packet radio, and now of course, as you say, wi-fi.
Folks
On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Peter Wayner wrote:
Can anyone give me a reference to this paper/project?
Is it the MIT project with a laser and glass balls in epoxide resin?
http://slashdot.org/articles/02/09/20/1217221.shtml?tid=172
http://www.nature.com/nsu/020916/020916-15.html
http://www.heise.de/newsticker/data/jk-02.09.03-005/
German police have searched and seized the rooms (dorm?) of one of the JAP
developers. They were on the look for data that was logged throughout the
period when JAP had to log specific traffic. The JAP-people say that the
seizure was not
--- begin forwarded text
Status: U
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:59:05 -0400
Subject: Re: Searching for uncopyable key made of sparkles in plastic
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: R. A. Hettinga [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Ravi Pappu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter,
That paper was the result of
Tim May is the perfect example why vigilante justice is
generally considered to be a bad thing -- stupid assholes
like Tim May spout off take action based on paranoia
instead of facts principles of anarchy instead of justice
and innocent parties get hurt.
Well, on one hand taking justice into
Tim wrote:
Even the owner of my ISP is narcing me out.
Read what he wrote recently to a Net.Nazi who wanted my speech limited:
I'm sorry that Tim is being a bother again. He has a long history of
being obnoxious and threatening. So far, he has not broken any laws. We
have talked to the
On Mon, Sep 01, 2003 at 12:03:00PM -0700, Meyer Wolfsheim wrote:
On Sun, 31 Aug 2003, Anonymous wrote:
Some librarians are probably now thinking they have a patriotic duty to
see what people are reading and to report any suspicious behavior.
First of all, the entire library community is
31 matches
Mail list logo
