Submitted for comment :-)
--
Yours,
J.A. Terranson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...justice is a duty towards those whom you love and those whom you do
not. And people's rights will not be harmed if the opponent speaks out
about them.
Osama Bin Laden
-- Forwarded message --
Elliot Shaikin sells privacy. But he doesn't accept credit cards.
Shaikin is the founder of Sovereign Solutions, a 3-year-old Las Vegas company that
provides individuals and corporations with confidential, anonymous and untraceable
personal security vaults. Clients of Sovereign Solutions need
- Forwarded message from David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: David Farber [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 09:07:14 -0400
To: Ip [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [IP] more on more on E-mail intercept ruling - good grief!!
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
Call me cynical (no... go ahead), but if VOIP is found to have no 4th
Amendment protection, Congress would first have to agree that this *is*
a problem before thay could fix it. Given the recent track record of
legislators vs. privacy, I'm not
The Tempest argument is a stretch, only because you're not actually
recovering the information from the phosphor itself. But the Pandora
argument is well taken.
Actually there is optical tempest now that works by watching the flicker
of a CRT. Point is actually even more moot since most
Sunder wrote:
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
Call me cynical (no... go ahead), but if VOIP is found to have no 4th
Amendment protection, Congress would first have to agree that this *is*
a problem before thay could fix it. Given the recent track record of
legislators vs.
Eugen Leitl forwarded:
The constitutional question is whether users have a reasonable
expectation of privacy in VOIP phone calls. Since the 1960's, the
Supreme Court has found a 4th Amendment protection for voice phone
calls. Meanwhile, it has found no constitutional protection for stored
