On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 01:19:46AM +, Justin wrote:
If I film off a HDTV screen with a HDTV camera (or just do single-frame
with a good professional camera) will the flag be preserved?
I don't think so, I think the flag is in the bitstream and doesn't
affect visual output at all. You
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 11:23:14AM +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
The point is that HDTV is a popular consumer technology, and the MPAA
and TV networks alone managed to hijack it.
I have yet to see a single HDTV movie/broadcast, and I understand most TV
sets can't display anything beyond
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 08:21:47PM +, Justin wrote:
They managed with the HTDV broadcast flag mandate.
If I film off a HDTV screen with a HDTV camera (or just do single-frame with
a good professional camera) will the flag be preserved?
Watermarks will, but that's the next mass genocide by
On 2005-02-03T22:25:28+0100, Anonymous wrote:
The only people endangered by this capability are those who want to be
able to lie. They want to agree to contracts and user agreements that,
for example, require them to observe DRM restrictions and copyright
laws, but then they want the power to
Anonymous wrote:
I challenge anyone here to answer the question of what it means to be
a cypherpunk. What are your goals? What is your philosophy? Do you
In this day and age, do you realy expect anyone to answer questions like
that openly and honestly? Really. There's a similar and simple
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2005/02/04/BAGV2B5O6P1.DTLtype=printable
www.sfgate.com Return to regular view
SANTA CLARA COUNTY
Sex offender list used to find dates, police say
Convict on Megan's Law roster charged with misdemeanor
- Ryan Kim, Chronicle
On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 19:07 -0800, James A. Donald wrote:
The ability to convincingly tell the truth is a very handy one
between people who are roughly equal. It is a potentially
disastrous one if one party can do violence with impunity to
the one with the ability to convincingly tell the
At 10:15 AM 2/4/2005, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
The beautiful part of using the (microwave) energy is that it leaves the
suspect in control of the car, he said. He can steer, he can brake, he
just can't accelerate.
Sorry Charlie, but I think newer vehicles are moving to fly-by-wire
steering,
Justin writes:
No, I want the right to fair use of material I buy. If someone sells
DRM-only material, I won't buy it at anything approaching non-DRM
prices. In some cases, I won't buy it at all.
Well, that's fine, nobody's forcing you to buy anything. But try to think
about this from a
Well, I agree with the general gist of this post though not it's specific
application.
OK...a Cypherpunk ultimately believes that technology and, in particular,
crypto give us the defacto (though, as you point out, not dejure) right to
certain levels of self-determination and that this 'right'
At 06:41 PM 2/4/05 -0800, Steve Schear wrote:
At 10:15 AM 2/4/2005, R.A. Hettinga wrote:
The beautiful part of using the (microwave) energy is that it
leaves the
suspect in control of the car, he said. He can steer, he can brake,
he
just can't accelerate.
Sorry Charlie, but I think newer
--- John Young [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The FBI continues to claim Jim Bell is a WMD threat
despite having no case against him except in the media,
but that conforms to current FBI/DHS policy of fictionalizing
homeland threats.
On 2005-02-04T23:28:56+0100, Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 08:21:47PM +, Justin wrote:
They managed with the HTDV broadcast flag mandate.
If I film off a HDTV screen with a HDTV camera (or just do single-frame
with a good professional camera) will the flag be preserved?
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 19:18 -0800, D. Popkin wrote:
The true danger of TCPA is not that free MP3s and movies will become
unavailable, but the de facto loss of privacy as non-TCPA gear becomes
unavailable or prohibitively expensive.
Agreed, in part. I don't think it'll fly too well if any
Wherein the ACLU pitches us with the flash-pizza from hell:
http://www.adcritic.com/interactive/view.php?id=5927
I suppose I might actually give a damn about the above scenario if a
*business* was able to obtain all that information from other *businesses*
on an open market, from information
As far as the question of malware exploiting TC, it's difficult to
evaulate without knowing more details about how the technology ends up
being used.
First there was TCPA, which is now called TCG. Microsoft spun off their
own version called Palladium, then NGSCB. But then Microsoft withdrew
Eric Murray writes:
The TCPA chip verifies the (signature on the) BIOS and the OS.
So the software driver is the one that's trusted by the TCPA chip.
I don't believe this is correct. The TPM does not verify any signatures.
It is fundamentally a passive chip. Its only job is to store hashes
of
--
On 3 Feb 2005 at 22:25, Anonymous wrote:
Now, my personal perspective on this is that this is no real
threat. It allows people who choose to use the capability to
issue reasonably credible and convincing statements about
their software configuration. Basically it allows people to
tell
I want the state gone: transform the situation to U.S. out of North
America. U.S. off the planet. Out of existence altogether.
Cheers,
RAH
---
http://www.satyamag.com/apr04/churchill.html
Satya April 04
Dismantling the Politics of Comfort
The Satya Interview with Ward Churchill
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Cypherpunks generally distrust the collectivist wisdom ...
Yes, but Big Brother governments are not the only way such wisdom
gets imposed. Bill Gates came close to imposing it upon all of us,
and if it hadn't been for Richard Stallman and Linus Torvalds, we
e'd like to remind those of you planning to attend this year's event that
CodeCon is fast approaching.
CodeCon is the premier event in 2005 for application developer community.
It is a workshop for developers of real-world applications with working
code and active development projects.
Past
Once again, the RSA Conference is upon us, and many of the
corrospondents on these lists will be in San Francisco. I'd like to
see if anyone is interested in getting together. We've done this
before.
At past conferences, we've had various levels of participation,
from 50 down to 3. Since the
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Trei, Peter wrote:
Once again, the RSA Conference is upon us, and many of the
corrospondents on these lists will be in San Francisco. I'd like to
see if anyone is interested in getting together. We've done this
before.
Yeah, but can we eat food, drink beer, shoot drugs
23 matches
Mail list logo
