On Mon, 22 Jul 2002 17:22:34 -0700, you wrote:
Wouldn't this requirement violate the probable cause requirement for seizures
of a person which been defined by a series of cases, beginning with Terry v. Ohio
, 392 U.S. 1, 88 S.Ct. 1868, 20 L.Ed.2d 889 (1968)?
steve
You are quite idealistic.
In this article http://news.com.com/2010-1079-945347.html?tag=politech you
said:
That's a reasonable position: The White House has never made an
unequivocal statement against the scheme, and it's possible that America
could edge toward a situation where the federal government devises an ID