At 06:34 AM 08/06/2003 -0400, Roy M. Silvernail wrote:
It would seem that Mencken [1] was correct, as well as Costello [2].
[1] http://www.bartleby.com/59/3/nooneeverwen.html
[2] http://www.brainyquote.com/quotes/quotes/e/q108965.html
Yup. Mr. Fuq is arguing at least two things:
- If Bob sends a
When I suggested a few weeks ago that someone would eventually argue for a
constitutionally guaranteed right to be heard, members of the list both
reminded me (quite correctly) that no such right does or can exist, and
opined that because of the obvious fallacy of the claim, no one would make
* Bill Stewart [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2003-08-06 21:24]:
Yup. Mr. Fuq is arguing at least two things:
- If Bob sends a message to Alice that Alice thinks is Spam,
You're close.. If Bob sends a message that meets the (yet to be
created) legal criteria for spam AND Alice thinks it is spam...
