hi,
I guess inspite of all these questions-I will wait
till I get to see a real one.But how will I know if it
was a real alien?
what if we are being tricked-If I could go back in
time along with a projector that projects a
holographic image of an alien and trick our ancestors
to beleive that
every other paradox?
Regards Sarath.
--- Mike Rosing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
As it says-they are self referecial
statements.What do
we learn from the liars paradox?
We arrive at a senseless result-doesn't all other
paradoxes do
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
There has been much speculation around Fermi's famous
question: Where are they? Why haven't we seen any
traces of intelligent extraterrestrial life?. One way
in which this question has been answered (Brin 1983)
is that we have not seen any traces of
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
So does the fermi paradox mean that there are no extra
terrestrials.Can't we throw away this paradox like
every other paradox?
It's easier to assume we don't know what we're looking for. That's not a
paradox at all. If you measure the same thing under
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Mike Rosing wrote:
On Sat, 4 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
So does the fermi paradox mean that there are no extra
terrestrials.Can't we throw away this paradox like
every other paradox?
It's easier to assume we don't know what we're looking for. That's not a
paradox
At 12:39 AM 01/04/2003 -0800, Sarad AV wrote:
There has been much speculation around Fermi's famous
question: Where are they? Why haven't we seen any
traces of intelligent extraterrestrial life?. One way
in which this question has been answered (Brin 1983)
is that we have not seen any traces of
) is false;
but, because the Liar Sentence is saying precisely
that (namely that it is false), (1) is true. So (1) is
true if and only if it is false. Since (1) is one or
the other, it is both.
As it says-they are self referecial statements.What do
we learn from the liars paradox?
We arrive
the liars paradox?
We arrive at a senseless result
The result isn't 'senseless', it is a understandable and -real world-
sentence. It however isn't 'true' or 'false' which was our original
assumption. Our assumption is what is failing, -not- the sentence
On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, Sarad AV wrote:
As it says-they are self referecial statements.What do
we learn from the liars paradox?
We arrive at a senseless result-doesn't all other
paradoxes do that-with the difference that they pick
only either true or false-which they so strongly
beleive
