Re: New Protection for 802.11

2002-11-07 Thread James A. Donald
-- Reading the Wifi report, http://www.weca.net/OpenSection/pdf/Wi- Fi_Protected_Access_Overview.pdf it seems their customers stampeded them and demanded that the security hole be fixed, fixed a damned lot sooner than they intended to fix it. I am struck the contrast between the seemingly

Re: New Protection for 802.11

2002-11-07 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 05:46 AM 11/7/02 -0800, Sarad AV wrote: hi, Wi fi customers are more paranoid than comparingly ordinary web users who are not so concerened of their security. That's just plain silly. Its like saying a cellphone user is more paranoid than a landline user. It was entirely convenience, with

Re: New Protection for 802.11

2002-11-07 Thread Mike Rosing
On Wed, 6 Nov 2002, James A. Donald wrote: -- Reading the Wifi report, http://www.weca.net/OpenSection/pdf/Wi- Fi_Protected_Access_Overview.pdf it seems their customers stampeded them and demanded that the security hole be fixed, fixed a damned lot sooner than they intended to fix it.

RE: New Protection for 802.11

2002-11-07 Thread Trei, Peter
James A. Donald[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote: Reading the Wifi report, http://www.weca.net/OpenSection/pdf/Wi- Fi_Protected_Access_Overview.pdf it seems their customers stampeded them and demanded that the security hole be fixed, fixed a damned lot sooner than they intended to fix it.