On Sun, 10 Nov 2002, Adam Shostack wrote:
A full police state can't prevent anything, it can just make some
things less common. For example, samizdat in the USSR still got
copied and passed around. Drug use is a problem in US prisons. Etc.
that kind of info can be limited by simply
Any wide-dissemination system must be distributed. Usenet used to fill this
role, but due to aggregation of major nodes and feeds it is not that any more.
Anything on the web has fixed pointers and already is or soon will be become
chokable. I'd be surprised if there is no development in progress
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 08:10:22PM -0800, Mike Rosing wrote:
| As long as there are people in the military who are willing and able to
| inform us on what they are *really* doing, we actually can feel pretty
| comfortable with their missions. It's gonna take a full polilce state
| to prevent the
On Sat, 9 Nov 2002, Major Variola (ret) wrote:
Specific use-cases can be written: the GI who took the picture; the
photo-developer-tech who
kept copies; the bored netop who intercepted the pix; an activist who is
under insert type
surveillance.
Anyone interested? And what does it mean (if
Here's the URL, I haven't noticed it in this message
thread yet:
http://www.artbell.com/letters88.html
-- gbn
On Sat, Nov 09, 2002 at 08:32:18PM -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
The subject line says it all, if one remembers Variola's clever dare.
As far as I'm concerned, this big
At 08:32 PM 11/9/02 -0500, Tyler Durden wrote:
So I'm still playing with the idea of a publically-accessible document
that
outlines the strategies, technologies, aims and requirements for
somehow
uploading images and data to public repositorioes.
Such a document should enumerate the threat model
The subject line says it all, if one remembers Variola's clever dare.
As far as I'm concerned, this big brother bullshit should work two ways: any
tyrrany should expect that any public actions will make it onto the net
somewhere. Of course, one day they'll probably begin a set of countermoves,
