DiSToAGe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it seems now intel say there is no DRM in there chips.
No, it's very careful to say that there is no *unannounced* DRM in their
chips, in the same way that we have had no undetected penetrations of our
security.
Peter.
DiSToAGe wrote:
not a backdoor, we forget to much that every system is only 1 and 0
through electricity and physical circuits. If you can make them you can
watch them (with time and monney i agree). Perhaps thinking that datas
(certs, instructions) can be hidden behind a physical thing is only
Eugen Leitl wrote...
Online activation of software is already quite widespread, so it seems
customers are willing to accept restriction to ownership and use.
Well, that's an interesting phenomenon. In industrialized nations where the
price of software is fairly low compared to the wages,
On 2005-05-28T21:53:52+0200, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Link: http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/05/28/1718200
Posted by: Zonk, on 2005-05-28 17:37:00
from the get-you-where-you-live dept.
Badluck writes Microsoft and the entertainment industry's holy grail
of controlling copyright
On Sat, May 28, 2005 at 11:26:28PM -0400, Tyler Durden wrote:
(Continued)
Contrary to expectations, however, sales of the chip have been suprisingly
low, with zero interest shown by major PC manufacturers. One major PC
industry executive, who wished to remain anonymous sated: There are 100s
Eugen Leitl wrote...
from the get-you-where-you-live dept.
Badluck writes Microsoft and the entertainment industry's holy grail
of controlling copyright through the motherboard has moved a step
closer with Intel Corp. now embedding [1]digital rights management
within in its
