At 01:40 PM 5/10/04 -0500, Brian Dunbar wrote:
On May 10, 2004, at 1:30 PM, Jack Lloyd wrote:
Like it matters. Do you really think that the government would really allow
Intel and AMD to sell CPUs that didn't have tiny transmitters in them?
Your CPU
is actually transmitting every instruction it
Like it matters. Do you really think that the government would really
allow Intel and AMD to sell CPUs that didn't have tiny transmitters in
them?
Your CPU is actually transmitting every instruction it executes to the
satellites.
That's why you keep your CPU under your tin-foil hat, isn't
John Young (2004-05-11 00:09Z) wrote:
Brian Dunbar wrote:
Like it matters. Do you really think that the government would really
allow Intel and AMD to sell CPUs that didn't have tiny transmitters in
them?
Your CPU is actually transmitting every instruction it executes to the
On May 10, 2004, at 1:30 PM, Jack Lloyd wrote:
Like it matters. Do you really think that the government would really
allow
Intel and AMD to sell CPUs that didn't have tiny transmitters in them?
Your CPU
is actually transmitting every instruction it executes to the
satellites.
That's a subtle
Like it matters. Do you really think that the government would really allow
Intel and AMD to sell CPUs that didn't have tiny transmitters in them? Your CPU
is actually transmitting every instruction it executes to the satellites.
On Mon, May 10, 2004 at 11:14:49AM -0700, Hasan Diwan wrote:
AES is the American Encryption Standard, formerly known as
Rijndael. Does anyone really think the US Government would be so daft
as to adopt an algorithm they don't know how to break?
On May 9, 2004, at 1:36 PM, Eugen Leitl wrote:
- Forwarded message from Enzo Michelangeli [EMAIL
Brian Dunbar wrote:
Like it matters. Do you really think that the government would really
allow Intel and AMD to sell CPUs that didn't have tiny transmitters in
them?
Your CPU is actually transmitting every instruction it executes to the
satellites.
That's a subtle bit of humor, right?
- Forwarded message from Enzo Michelangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Enzo Michelangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2004 20:01:57 +0800
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Axel H Horns [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Can Skype be wiretapped by the authorities?
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook
On Sun, 9 May 2004, Eugen Leitl wrote:
Not only that: NATted agents cannot be called unless they first register
with some reflector on the open Internet. And centralized reflectors are,
again, easy to attack, and also expensive to operate, as the bandwidth
requirements are substantial (all
