Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-26 Thread Bill Stewart
At 10:23 AM 11/24/2002 -0600, Neil Johnson wrote: (Referring to previous thread about capturing video.) As I sit here looking at a 64 MB SD Card that I just picked up for $28 at my local Wally World, I was wondering why it (or it is larger capacity brethren) couldn't be used to record video and

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-25 Thread Major Variola (ret)
At 10:12 PM 11/24/02 +0100, Eugen Leitl wrote: On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Tyler Durden wrote: I believe Daniel Hillis (or was it Jaron Lanier?) inserted time-capsule information into a cockroach's DNA and released it into the Boston subways. He calculated that this would be the way to preserve

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Eugen Leitl
On Sun, 24 Nov 2002, Morlock Elloi wrote: Isn't all snail mail already irradiated ? Then soon. It's not, because electron accelerators are a) expensive b) tend to damage mail. Besides, the few ug or ng dry DNA in the microdot is not a living being. It can remain readable at ridiculously

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Morlock Elloi
couldn't be used to record video and then (after appropriate protection) swallowed. Eventually this will happen. Maybe a video recorded into a DNA of a bacteria synthesized in a portable device (diamond age, anyone ?) Ne protocols will be required (if I infect this east coast girl, how long

Re: Video Mules: (Was: Re: Psuedo-Private Key (eJazeera) )

2002-11-24 Thread Tyler Durden
This assumes the insert doesn't result in negative fitness (could very well be, if the insert kills a gene). If the information is the history of human civilization, that may very well end up being information of great negative fitness! (We shall see...) Actually, from what I understand, there