Nomen Nescio wrote:
Ben Laurie wrote:
Albion Zeglin wrote:
Similar to DeCSS, only one Palladium chip needs to be reverse engineered and
it's key(s) broken to virtualize the machine.
If you break one machine's key:
a) You won't need to virtualise it
b) It won't be getting any new software
Ben Laurie wrote:
Albion Zeglin wrote:
Similar to DeCSS, only one Palladium chip needs to be reverse engineered and
it's key(s) broken to virtualize the machine.
If you break one machine's key:
a) You won't need to virtualise it
b) It won't be getting any new software licensed to it
Albion Zeglin wrote:
Similar to DeCSS, only one Palladium chip needs to be reverse engineered and
it's key(s) broken to virtualize the machine.
If you break one machine's key:
a) You won't need to virtualise it
b) It won't be getting any new software licensed to it
Simulate a Pentium VI
Ben Laurie [EMAIL PROTECTED] was seen to declaim:
Albion Zeglin wrote:
Similar to DeCSS, only one Palladium chip needs to be reverse
engineered and it's key(s) broken to virtualize the machine.
If you break one machine's key:
a) You won't need to virtualise it
b) It won't be getting any new
